Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
- PMID: 27567279
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31388-5
Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1882. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31808-6. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27751398 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Outcomes are poor for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and no well established first-line chemotherapy is available for the disease. We compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were recruited from 22 hospitals in China. Key inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ function, and measurable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1), or fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1 given intravenously) once every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The randomisation was done centrally via an interactive phone response system using block randomisation with a size of six. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by the independent image committee in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one cycle of study drug. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01528618.
Findings: Between Feb 20, 2012, and Oct 30, 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to a group (181 to the gemcitabine [plus cisplatin] group and 181 to the fluorouracil [plus cisplatin] group). Median follow-up time for progression-free survival was 19·4 months (IQR 12·1-35·6). The median progression-free survival was 7·0 months (4·4-10·9) in the gemcitabine group and 5·6 months (3·0-7·0) in the fluorouracil group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55 [95% CI 0·44-0·68]; p<0·0001). A total of 180 patients in the gemcitabine group and 173 patients in the fluorouracil group were included in the safety analysis. Significantly different treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the gemcitabine and fluorouracil groups were leucopenia (52 [29%] vs 15 [9%]; <0·0001), neutropenia (41 [23%] vs 23 [13%]; p=0·0251), thrombocytopenia (24 [13%] vs three [2%]; p=0·0007), and mucosal inflammation (0 vs 25 [14%]; <0·0001). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (4%) patients in the gemcitabine group and ten (6%) in the fluorouracil group. Six (3%) patients in the gemcitabine group and 14 (8%) patients in the fluorouracil group discontinued treatment because of drug-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.
Interpretation: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin prolongs progression-free survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The results establish gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the standard first-line treatment option for this population.
Funding: Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Programme, Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project (grant numbers 81372502 and 81201917), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program numbers 2012AA02A501 and 2012AA02A502), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (grant number S2013010016564).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1853-1854. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31394-0. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27567280 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine versus cisplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):798-810. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00232-2. Epub 2023 Jun 5. Lancet Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37290468 Clinical Trial.
-
Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) alone or in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results from two single-arm, phase 1 trials.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1338-1350. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9. Epub 2018 Sep 10. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30213452 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction chemotherapy with lobaplatin and fluorouracil versus cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):716-726. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00075-9. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33857411 Clinical Trial.
-
Cisplatin alone or combined with gemcitabine in carcinomas of unknown primary: results of the randomised GEFCAPI 02 trial.Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(5):721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Feb 6. Eur J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22317952 Review.
-
Efficacy of Anti-PD1 Blockade in Treating Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Oral Oncol. 2023 Jan;136:106242. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106242. Epub 2022 Nov 19. Oral Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36413976
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1265784. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265784. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37964872 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a magnetic resonance imaging-based model for the prediction of distant metastasis before initial treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb;40:327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 11. EBioMedicine. 2019. PMID: 30642750 Free PMC article.
-
Dendritic cell therapy with CD137L-DC-EBV-VAX in locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is safe and confers clinical benefit.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Jun;71(6):1531-1543. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03075-3. Epub 2021 Oct 18. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022. PMID: 34661709 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment and Survival Outcomes Associated With Platinum Plus Low-Dose, Long-term Fluorouracil for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138444. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38444. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34902036 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing M1 stage subdivisions by incorporating radiological features and Epstein-Barr virus DNA for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):83. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.13. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32175376 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical