Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;48(1):165-170.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

Hand Hygiene Compliance in the Setting of Trauma Resuscitation

Affiliations

Hand Hygiene Compliance in the Setting of Trauma Resuscitation

Bryce Haac et al. Injury. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections are a significant health burden, and hand hygiene (HH) is an essential prevention strategy. World Health Organization (WHO) 2009 guidelines recommend washing hands during five moments of patient care; 1)before touching a patient; 2)before a clean procedure; 3)after body fluid exposure; and 4)after touching a patient or 5)patient surroundings. HH opportunities at these 5 moments are frequent and compliance is low (22-60%). Infection risk is particularly high in trauma patients, and HH compliance during active trauma resuscitation has yet to be evaluated.

Materials and methods: Using video surveillance, all healthcare worker (HCW)-patient interactions for 30 patients were retrospectively reviewed for HH compliance according to WHO guidelines and glove use during initial resuscitation at a level-1 trauma center.

Results: 342 HCW-patient interactions and 1034 HH opportunities were observed. HH compliance with the WHO moments was 7% (71/1034) overall; 3% (10/375) before patient contact, 0% (0/178) before a clean procedure, 11% (2/19) after body fluid contact, 15% (57/376) after patient contact and 2% (2/86) after contact with the environment. Glove use was more common, particularly before (69%) and after (47%) patient contact and after body fluid contact (58%). No HH was observed before clean procedures, but HCW donned new gloves 75% of the time before bedside procedures. If donning/removing gloves was included with HH as compliant, compliance was 57% overall.

Conclusion: HH opportunities are frequent and compliance with WHO HH guidelines may be infeasible, requiring significant amounts of time that may be better spent with the patient during the golden hour of trauma resuscitation. In an era where more scrutiny is being applied to patient safety, particularly the prevention of inpatient infections, more research is needed to identify alternative strategies (e.g. glove use, prioritizing moments) that may more effectively promote compliance in this setting.

Keywords: Compliance; Critical Care; Hand Hygiene; Resuscitation; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, et al. Burden of endemic health-care associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228–41. - PubMed
    1. Al-Rawajfah OM, Hewitt JB, Stetzer F, et al. Length of stay and charges associated with health care-acquired bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control. 2012 Apr;40(3):227–32. - PubMed
    1. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23;173(22):2039–46. - PubMed
    1. Vrijens F, Hulstaert F, Devriese S, et al. Hospital-acquired infections in Belgian acute-care hospitals: an estimation of their global impact on mortality, length of stay and healthcare costs. Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Jan;140(1):126–36. - PubMed
    1. Roberts RR, Scott RD, Hota B, et al. Costs attributable to healthcare-acquired infection in hospitalized adults and a comparison of economic methods. Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):1026–35. - PubMed