Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;113(Pt A):175-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Regulation and role of endogenously produced hydrogen sulfide in angiogenesis

Affiliations
Review

Regulation and role of endogenously produced hydrogen sulfide in angiogenesis

Antonia Katsouda et al. Pharmacol Res. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Recent studies have implicated endogenously produced H2S in the angiogenic process. On one hand, pharmacological inhibition and silencing of the enzymes involved in H2S synthesis attenuate the angiogenic properties of endothelial cells, including proliferation, migration and tube-like structure network formation. On the other hand, enhanced production of H2S by substrate supplementation or over-expression of H2S-producing enzymes leads to enhanced angiogenic responses in cultured endothelial cells. Importantly, H2S up-regulates expression of the key angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and contributes to the angiogenic signaling in response to VEGF. The signaling pathways mediating H2S-induced angiogenesis include mitogen-activated protein kinases, phosphoinositide-3 kinase, nitric oxide/cGMP-regulated cascades and ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Endogenously produced H2S has also been shown to facilitate neovascularization in prototypical model systems in vivo, and to contribute to wound healing, post-ischemic angiogenesis in the heart and other tissues, as well as in tumor angiogenesis. Targeting of H2S synthesizing enzymes might offer novel therapeutic opportunities for angiogenesis-related diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proposed interactions between VEGF and H2S
VEGF binding to VEGFR2 causes enhanced H2S production presumably by activating CSE in a calcium-dependent manner. Nucleophilic attack of the disulfide bond between Cys 1045-1024 by H2S leads to a disulfide reduction and boosts VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase activity. H2S generated by CBS increases the stability and transcriptional activity of Sp1, enhancing VEGFR2 transcription. H2S causes an increase in HIF-1α levels, DNA binding and transcriptional activity. VEGFR2 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2); VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor); CSE (cystathionine-γ lyase); CBS (cystathionine-β synthase); HIF (hypoxia inducible factor); HRE (hypoxia response element); Sp1 (specificity protein 1); H2S (hydrogen sulfide)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Interactions of H2S and NO in angiogenesis
NO activates sGC to increase cGMP levels, while H2S both facilitates cGMP production (by activating eNOS and keeping the sGC in a reduced NO-responsive state) and prevents cGMP breakdown by inhibiting PDE. This allows cGMP to reach the threshold levels required to trigger PKG angiogenic signaling. H2S also promotes eNOS dimerization through eNOS persulfidation. PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase); Akt (protein kinase B); PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog); 3,4,5 InsP3 (phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate); 4,5 InsP2 (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate); eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase); sGC (soluble guanylate cyclase); cGMP (cyclic guanosine monophosphate); GMP (guanosine monophosphate); PDE (phosphodiesterase); PKG (cGMP-dependent protein kinase), NO (nitric oxide); H2S (hydrogen sulfide)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative photomicrographs of chorioallantoic membranes incubated with vehicle (control), PAG or BCA. A clear reduction in the vascular network is seen when CSE is inhibited (magnification × 2,5).
Figure 4
Figure 4. PAG inhibits VEGF-stimulated angiogenesis in vivo
C57BL/6 male mice 10–12 weeks old mice were randomized in 4 groups (4 mice/group): 1. CONTROL: 100μl water for injection (WFI) intra-peritoneally (i.p.) for 15 days, 2. PAG: 100μl of 50mg/kg in WFI PAG i.p. for 15 days, 3. VEGF:100μl WFI i.p. for 15 days and 4.PAG+VEGF: 100μl of 50mg/kg in WFI PAG i.p. for 15 days. The first day, mice were anesthetized by a 1–2 min exposure to isoflurane and 400μl 50:50 Matrigel® Matrix: 1xPBS with or without VEGF(100ng/ml) was infused subcutaneously. Mice were sacrificed 16 days after Matrigel® injection. (A) Macroscopic appearance and vessel infiltration in Matrigel plugs (B) Hemoglobin content in μg/mg *p<0.05 vs Control, ***p<0.01 vs Control, #p<0.05 vs VEGF. (C) Immunostaining for the expression of endothelial cell marker CD31 staining in 5μm sections of Matrigel® plugs. 40X magnification.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams RH, Alitalo K. Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:464–478. - PubMed
    1. Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med. 2000;6:389–395. - PubMed
    1. Folkman J. Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:273–286. - PubMed
    1. Flamme I, Frölich T, Risau W. Molecular mechanisms of vasculogenesis and embryonic angiogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 1997;173:206–210. - PubMed
    1. Potente M, Gerhardt H, Carmeliet P. Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Angiogenesis. Cell. 2011;146:873–887. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances