Definitions and Developmental Processes in Research on Infant Morality
- PMID: 27570254
- PMCID: PMC4996116
- DOI: 10.1159/000364919
Definitions and Developmental Processes in Research on Infant Morality
Abstract
Key terms in research on moral development also exist in everyday language. Tafreshi and her colleagues (2014) propose that researchers should use terms in ways consistent with their usage by non-researchers. This commentary questions this claim, and argues for the importance of providing clear and explicit definitions of terms such as "morality" and "innate," of showing caution when attributing evaluations and judgments to infants, and of considering developmental processes preceding and succeeding the abilities demonstrated using looking-time and related measures. Progress is unlikely to result from conceptual analysis alone. However, conceptual clarity will make it easier to see what theories agree and disagree about as well as how opposing claims can be tested empirically.
Keywords: infancy; looking time methodology; moral development.
References
-
- Acredolo LP. Development of spatial orientation in infancy. Developmental Psychology. 1978;14(3):224–234.
-
- Allen JWP, Bickhard MH. Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate. Cognitive Development. 2013;28(2):96–133.
-
- Aslin RN. Why take the cog out of infant cognition? Infancy. 2000;1(4):463–470. - PubMed
-
- Barrett KC, Zahn-Waxler C, Cole PM. Avoiders vs. amenders: Implications for the investigation of guilt and shame during Toddlerhood? Cognition & Emotion. 1993;7(6):481–505.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources