Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;111(513):107-117.
doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1123157. Epub 2016 May 5.

Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-level Information from External Big Data Sources

Affiliations

Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-level Information from External Big Data Sources

Nilanjan Chatterjee et al. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Information from various public and private data sources of extremely large sample sizes are now increasingly available for research purposes. Statistical methods are needed for utilizing information from such big data sources while analyzing data from individual studies that may collect more detailed information required for addressing specific hypotheses of interest. In this article, we consider the problem of building regression models based on individual-level data from an "internal" study while utilizing summary-level information, such as information on parameters for reduced models, from an "external" big data source. We identify a set of very general constraints that link internal and external models. These constraints are used to develop a framework for semiparametric maximum likelihood inference that allows the distribution of covariates to be estimated using either the internal sample or an external reference sample. We develop extensions for handling complex stratified sampling designs, such as case-control sampling, for the internal study. Asymptotic theory and variance estimators are developed for each case. We use simulation studies and a real data application to assess the performance of the proposed methods in contrast to the generalized regression (GR) calibration methodology that is popular in the sample survey literature.

Keywords: Case-control study; Empirical likelihood; Generalized regression estimator; Misspecified model; Profile-likelihood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geometric interpretation of the problem. The true distribution function P0(Y|X) for Y given (X, Z) across all values of β is depicted in the left panel, with the true value of β, i.e., β0 shown. In the right top panel, we see the true distribution function P0(Y|X) for Y given X across all values of β with β0 shown. The assumed external data model is given in the bottom right panel across all values of θ, with the solution θ* to (1) being shown as the minimizer of the Kullback-Leibler distance between the fixed P0(Y|X) and the model space of gθ(Y|X).

References

    1. Bell WR, Datta GS, Ghosh M. Benchmarking Small Area Estimators. Biometrika. 2013;100:189–202.
    1. Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Commonly Studied Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer: Results From the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2006;98:1382–1396. - PubMed
    1. Breslow NE, Holubkov R. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Logistic Regression Parameters Under Two-Phase, Outcome-Dependent Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 1997;59:447–461.
    1. Canzian F, Cox D, Setiawan V, Wendy, Stram D, Ziegler R, Dossus L, Beckmann L, Blanch H, Barricarte A, Berg C, Bingham S, Buring J, Buys S, Calle E, Chanock S, Clavel-Chapelon F, DeLancey J, Diver W, Dorronsoro M, Haiman C, Hallmans G, Hankinson S, Hunter D, Hsing A, Isaacs C, Khaw K, Kolonel L, Kraft P, Le Marchand L, Lund E, Overvad K, Panico S, Peeters P, Pollak M, Thun M, Tjnneland A, Trichopoulos D, Tumino R, Yeager M, Hoover R, Riboli E, Thomas G, Henderson B, Kaaks R, Feigelson H. Comprehensive Analysis of Common Genetic Variation in 61 Genes Related to Steroid Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Metabolism and Breast Cancer Risk in the NCI Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. Human Molecular Genetics. 2010;19:3873–3884. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Graubard B, Schairer C, Byrne C, Benichou J, Gail MH. Projecting Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in White Women With a Model That Includes Mammographie Density. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2006;98:1215–1226. - PubMed