Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;26(1):77-87.
doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers

Affiliations

TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers

Rebecca J Mercier et al. Crit Public Health. 2016.

Abstract

Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers (TRAP laws) are proliferating in the United States and have increased barriers to abortion access. In order to comply with these laws, abortion providers make significant changes to facilities and clinical practices. In this article, we draw attention to an often unacknowledged area of public health threat: how providers adapt to increasing regulation, and the resultant strains on the abortion provider workforce. Current US legal standards for abortion regulations have led to an increase in laws that target abortion providers. We describe recent research with abortion providers in North Carolina to illustrate how providers adapt to new regulations, and how compliance with regulation leads to increased workload and increased financial and emotional burdens on providers. We use the concept of invisible labor to highlight the critical work undertaken by abortion providers not only to comply with regulations, but also to minimize the burden that new laws impose on patients. This labor provides a crucial bridge in the preservation of abortion access. The impact of TRAP laws on abortion providers should be included in the consideration of the public health impact of abortion laws.

Keywords: Abortion; health policy; invisible labor; reproductive health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen A. Autonomy’s magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation. Boston University Law Review. 1992;72(4):683–698. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett L, Berg C, Shulman H, Zane S, Green C, Whitehead S, Atrash H. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;103(4):729–737. - PubMed
    1. Baum S, Grossman D, Potter J. Abortion patients’ out-of-pocket expenditures for consultation visit: financial burden of the two visit requirement in Texas. Presented at the 141st APHA Annual Meeting and Expo; Boston, MA. 2013.
    1. Benshoof J. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a “fundamental” right. Women’s Health Issues. 1993a;3(3):162–170. - PubMed
    1. Benshoof J. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care. JAMA. 1993b;269(17):2249–2257. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources