Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 12:10:33.
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00033. eCollection 2016.

Automated Detection of Lupus White Matter Lesions in MRI

Affiliations

Automated Detection of Lupus White Matter Lesions in MRI

Eloy Roura et al. Front Neuroinform. .

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging provides detailed information which can be used to detect and segment white matter lesions (WML). In this work we propose an approach to automatically segment WML in Lupus patients by using T1w and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Lupus WML appear as small focal abnormal tissue observed as hyperintensities in the FLAIR images. The quantification of these WML is a key factor for the stratification of lupus patients and therefore both lesion detection and segmentation play an important role. In our approach, the T1w image is first used to classify the three main tissues of the brain, white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), while the FLAIR image is then used to detect focal WML as outliers of its GM intensity distribution. A set of post-processing steps based on lesion size, tissue neighborhood, and location are used to refine the lesion candidates. The proposal is evaluated on 20 patients, presenting qualitative, and quantitative results in terms of precision and sensitivity of lesion detection [True Positive Rate (62%) and Positive Prediction Value (80%), respectively] as well as segmentation accuracy [Dice Similarity Coefficient (72%)]. Obtained results illustrate the validity of the approach to automatically detect and segment lupus lesions. Besides, our approach is publicly available as a SPM8/12 toolbox extension with a simple parameter configuration.

Keywords: automatic lesion detection and segmentation; image analysis; lupus disease; magnetic resonance images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of the full pipeline. T1w and FLAIR images are the original subject images, which require a co-registration. Once co-registered they undergone a separate pre-processing, T1w by SPM8/12 to obtain the tissue segmentation and the brain mask, while FLAIR is denoised and unbiased by separate methods. The atlas and its structures also belong to the SPM space, so they can be brought to the subject space as the tissue segmentation and the brain mask. The corrected FLAIR image, the tissue segmentation and the posterior fossa mask are the inputs of the WML segmentation tool.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neighboring rule. FLAIR 2D axial slice (A) showing 2 lesions (in green) of 4 and 5 voxels, respectively (B), both completely surrounded by white matter. Original image and tissue segmentation result of two slices forward are shown in (C,D). The bottom row shows four zooms of the original image, ground truth (green), candidates regions (red), and final lesion segmentation (blue).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Joint evaluation of both α and λ parameters (x and y axes, respectively) for each training set within the two-fold cross-validation. Each position in the map represents the mean F-score for a specific tissue neighborhood ratio λ and the initial candidate lesions adjustment α. Reddish colors show higher mean F-score values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bar plots of each patient representing the DSC, TPR, and PPV values. The population is stratified in three groups depending on the GT number of lesions, from left to right: < 5; [5−25]; >25 lesions per patient.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation with number of lesions (stratified by the three groups) on the left and lesion volume, in terms of voxels, on the right.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bland-Altman plot of the lesion volume for those cases below 500 mm3 of average volume. There is also one outlier not represented with 400 mm3 of difference volume and 370 mm3 of average volume. Besides, two scatter points over 500 mm3 of average volume have also been removed, although the difference volume was 10 mm3 for both. The* represents the mean difference volume when removing the outlier from the analysis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Qualitative results of the approach. First row of each patient shows the original FLAIR image and second row shows the automatic segmentation (green, TP; red, FP; and yellow, FN).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainiala H., Dastidar P., Loukkola J., Lehtimaki T., Korpela M., Peltola J., Hietaharju A. (2005). Cerebral MRI abnormalities and their association with neuropsychiatric manifestations in SLE: a population – based study. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 34, 376–382. 10.1080/03009740510026643 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appenzeller S., Pike G., Clarke A. (2008a). Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of central nervous system manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 34, 361–366. 10.1007/s12016-007-8060-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appenzeller S., Vasconcelos Faria A., Li L., Costallat L., Cendes F. (2008b). Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analyses and clinical significance of hyperintense white matter lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Ann. Neurol. 64, 635–643. 10.1002/ana.21483 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashburner J., Friston K. J. (2005). Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boesen K., Rehm K., Schaper K., Stoltzner S., Woods R., Lüders E., et al. . (2004). Quantitative comparison of four brain extraction algorithms. Neuroimage 22, 1255–1261. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.010 - DOI - PubMed