Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;37(9):948-56.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.9.15003.

Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry

Affiliations
Review

Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry

Maha A AlSarheed. Saudi Med J. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the intranasal (IN) sedatives used to achieve conscious sedation during dental procedures amongst children.

Methods: A literature review was conducted by identifying relevant studies through searches on Medline. Search included IN of midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, haloperidol, and loranzepam. Studies included were conducted amongst individuals below 18 years, published in English, and were not restricted by year. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not focus on pediatric dentistry.

Results: Twenty studies were included. The most commonly used sedatives were midazolam, followed by ketamine and sufentanil. Onset of action for IN midazolam was 5-15 minutes (min), however, IN ketamine was faster (mean 5.74 min), while both IN sufentanil (mean 20 min) and IN dexmedetomidine (mean 25 min) were slow in comparison. Midazolam was effective for modifying behavior in mild to moderately anxious children, however, for more invasive or prolonged procedures, stronger sedatives, such as IN ketamine, IN sufentanil were recommended. In addition, ketamine fared better in overall success rate (89%) when compared with IN midazolam (69%). Intranasal dexmedetomidine was only used as pre-medication amongst children. While its' onset of action is longer when compared with IN midazolam, it produced deeper sedation at the time of separation from the parent and at the time of anesthesia induction.

Conclusion: Intranasal midazolam, ketamine, and sufentanil are effective and safe for conscious sedation, while intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and sufentanil have proven to be effective premedications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart illustrating the study selection process for the study of intranasal sedative in the pediatric dentistry. N - number of studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chhabra N, Chhabra A, Walia G. Prevalence of dental anxiety and fear among five to ten year old children: a behaviour based cross sectional study. Minerva Stomatol. 2012;61:83–89. - PubMed
    1. Willson S. Pharmacological management of the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:131–136. - PubMed
    1. Lee-Kim SJ, Fadavi S, Punwani I, Koerber A. Nasal versus oral midazolam sedation for pediatric dental patients. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004;71:126–130. - PubMed
    1. Heard C, Smith J, Creighton P, Joshi P, Feldman D, Lerman J. A comparison of four sedation techniques for pediatric dental surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:924–930. - PubMed
    1. Burstein AH, Modica R, Hatton M, Gengo FM. Intranasal midazolam plasma concentration profile and its effect on anxiety associated with dental procedures. Anesth Prog. 1996;43:52–57. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources