Sense of Coherence and Gambling: Exploring the Relationship Between Sense of Coherence, Gambling Behaviour and Gambling-Related Harm
- PMID: 27572488
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9640-8
Sense of Coherence and Gambling: Exploring the Relationship Between Sense of Coherence, Gambling Behaviour and Gambling-Related Harm
Abstract
Understanding why some people experience problems with gambling whilst others are able to restrict gambling to recreational levels is still largely unexplained. One potential explanation is through salutogenesis, which is a health promotion approach of understanding factors which move people towards health rather than disease. An important aspect of salutogenesis is sense of coherence. Individuals with stronger sense of coherence perceive their environment as comprehensible, manageable and meaningful. The present study examined the relationship of individuals' sense of coherence on their gambling behaviour and experience of gambling related harm. This exploratory study utilised an archival dataset (n = 1236) from an online, cross sectional survey of people who had experienced negative consequences from gambling. In general, a stronger sense of coherence was related to lower problem gambling severity. When gambling behaviour was controlled for, sense of coherence was significantly related to the experience of individual gambling harms. A strong sense of coherence can be seen as a protective factor against problematic gambling behaviour, and subsequent gambling related harms. These findings support the value of both primary and tertiary prevention strategies that strengthen sense of coherence as a harm minimisation strategy. The present study demonstrates the potential value of, and provides clear direction for, considering sense of coherence in order to understand gambling-related issues.
Keywords: Determinants of health; Gambling harm; Problem gambling; Protective factors; Risk factors; Salutogenesis.
Similar articles
-
Breaking Bad: Comparing Gambling Harms Among Gamblers and Affected Others.J Gambl Stud. 2017 Mar;33(1):223-248. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9632-8. J Gambl Stud. 2017. PMID: 27443306
-
Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms.BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 27;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26818137 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21080998. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39200609 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: an online study of 16-88 year olds in Victoria, Australia.Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jul 25;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0173-y. Harm Reduct J. 2017. PMID: 28743300 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes Towards Gambling and Gambling Reform in Australia.J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):243-59. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9529-y. J Gambl Stud. 2016. PMID: 25700668
Cited by
-
Attitudes towards gambling, gambling participation, and gambling-related harm: cross-sectional Finnish population studies in 2011 and 2015.BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4056-7. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28122531 Free PMC article.
-
What is known about population level programs designed to address gambling-related harm: rapid review of the evidence.Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 18;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01032-8. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 38890632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is there a health inequality in gambling related harms? A systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10337-3. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33549082 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical