Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;30(12):2422-2426.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.247. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

Targeted sequencing informs the evaluation of normal karyotype cytopenic patients for low-grade myelodysplastic syndrome

Affiliations

Targeted sequencing informs the evaluation of normal karyotype cytopenic patients for low-grade myelodysplastic syndrome

E J Duncavage et al. Leukemia. 2016 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gene mutations present in cytopenic patients and subsequent clinical outcome
(a) Distribution of recurrent gene mutations by morphologic category in cytopenic patients. A total of 40 genes were mutated at least once. Colors indicate the morphologic classification: dysplasia (blue), equivocal dysplasia (orange), no dysplasia (green). (b) Frequency of cases in each diagnostic category with at least one somatic mutation. (c) Somatic mutation variant allele fractions (VAFs) by morphologic category. Red points indicate the maximum VAF for each case; blue bars indicate the median VAF for each category. (d) Number of somatic mutations per case for each diagnostic category. There was a significant difference between the number of mutations per case in the dysplasia vs. no dysplasia and equivocal dysplasia vs. no dysplasia categories (student's t-test); blue bars indicate median values. (e) Follow-up data for patients in the equivocal or no dysplasia categories grouped by mutational status. The length of the bar indicates the duration of follow-up; black triangles indicate when patients were treated for MDS; blue triangles indicate when follow-up sequencing was performed.

References

    1. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937–51. - PubMed
    1. Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D, Ades L, Cermak J, Del Canizo C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2013 Oct 24;122(17):2943–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senent L, Arenillas L, Luno E, Ruiz JC, Sanz G, Florensa L. Reproducibility of the World Health Organization 2008 criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2013 Apr;98(4):568–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nybakken GE, Bagg A. The genetic basis and expanding role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic design for myelodysplastic syndromes. The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD. 2014 Mar;16(2):145–58. - PubMed
    1. Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, Okuno Y, Bacher U, Nagae G, et al. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2014 Feb;28(2):241–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types