Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 30;13(9):705-6.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3963.

Impact of outdated gene annotations on pathway enrichment analysis

Affiliations

Impact of outdated gene annotations on pathway enrichment analysis

Lina Wadi et al. Nat Methods. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 |
Figure 1 |
Outdated pathway analysis resources strongly affect practical genomic analysis and literature. (a) The majority of public software tools for pathway enrichment analysis use outdated gene annotations, and the majority of surveyed papers published in 2015 used annotations that were more than five years old. (b) Density plots showing the evolution of pathway knowledge (GO + Reactome) between 2009 (left) and 2016 (right). The values for the median gene are indicated by green dashed lines. The bottom left group in the 2016 plot corresponds to Reactome pathways. (c) Gene annotation quality is improving rapidly as manually curated Reactome annotations are becoming more frequent and fewer genes in GO are IEA. (d) Pathway enrichment analysis of frequently mutated GBM genes showing the proportion of results missed in outdated GO annotations. Each bar compares annotations from a given year to 2016 annotations. (e) Enrichment map of frequently mutated GBM pathways and processes according to gene annotations from 2010 and 2016. Three-quarters of current findings are missed in out-of-date analyses (purple). Nodes represent processes and pathways, and edges connect nodes with many shared genes. Stars indicate clinically actionable pathways.

References

    1. Creixell P. et al. Nat. Methods 12, 615–621 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashburner M. et al. Nat. Genet 25, 25–29 (2000). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croft D. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D472–D477 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reimand J, Kull M, Peterson H, Hansen J & Vilo J Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W193–W200 (2007). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mi H, Muruganujan A & Thomas PD Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D377–D386 (2013). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types