Alterations of lymph nodes evaluation after colon cancer resection: patient and tumor heterogeneity should be taken into consideration
- PMID: 27577077
- PMCID: PMC5308756
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11633
Alterations of lymph nodes evaluation after colon cancer resection: patient and tumor heterogeneity should be taken into consideration
Abstract
Despite the adequacy of nodal evaluation was gradually improved for colon cancer (CC), rare attention has been paid for the effect of patient and tumor heterogeneity on nodal evaluation. We identified 109902 CC patients in stage I-III from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database during 2004-2013. The lymph nodes evaluations were separately assessed in different patient- and tumor-related features, including gender, age, T stage, histology, tumor differentiation, tumor size and tumor location. The 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests were used to compare the differences of CSS in patients with ≥12 and <12 lymph nodes examined. Here, we identified features including gender, age, T stage, tumor differentiation, tumor size and location were independently associated with the median number of lymph node, the rate of ≥12 lymph nodes and the rate of node positivity of CC patients. We then divided CC patients into 29 subgroups according to different patient- and tumor-related features. The median number of lymph node presented a large variance from 12 to 24, the rate of ≥12 lymph nodes increased from 53.2% to 91.2% under the combined effect of patient and tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, the positive association between increased lymph nodes count and improved survival couldn't be observed in 8261 CC patients with the effect of this heterogeneity. In conclusion, the tumor and patient heterogeneity lead to large alterations of nodal evaluation; we should pay more attention to this effect in clinical practice.
Keywords: SEER; colon cancer; lymph nodes; patient features; tumor features.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Exploration of the Optimal Minimum Lymph Node Count after Colon Cancer Resection for Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 12;6:38901. doi: 10.1038/srep38901. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27941906 Free PMC article.
-
Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):1090-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.404. Epub 2013 Sep 14. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 24045143
-
Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer.Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 13;7(37):59945-59956. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11007. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27494866 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of total number of lymph nodes retrieved differs between left-sided colon cancer and right-sided colon cancer in stage III patients with colon cancer.BMC Cancer. 2018 May 11;18(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4431-5. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29751794 Free PMC article.
-
Lymph node evaluation in early-stage colon cancer.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008 Jul;7(4):240-6. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2008.n.031. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18650192 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting survival time of lung cancer patients using radiomic analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 1;8(61):104393-104407. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22251. eCollection 2017 Nov 28. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29262648 Free PMC article.
-
Association of hemicolectomy with survival in stage II colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2211-2223. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01646-w. Epub 2023 Nov 24. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 38001388
-
Comparison of long-term outcome between hemicolectomy and partial colectomy in the elderly: a large population-based study.Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 10;8(31):51076-51085. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16993. eCollection 2017 Aug 1. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28881631 Free PMC article.
-
A Preoperative Risk Prediction Model for Lymph Node Examination of Stage I-III Colon Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.J Cancer. 2020 Mar 5;11(11):3303-3309. doi: 10.7150/jca.41056. eCollection 2020. J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32231735 Free PMC article.
-
CT-Based Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for Predicting Postoperative Recurrence Risk in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 19;11:644933. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.644933. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33816297 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wolpin BM, Meyerhardt JA, Mamon HJ, Mayer RJ. Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:168–185. - PubMed
-
- Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71. - PubMed
-
- Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D, Simunovic M. Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:439–445. - PubMed
-
- Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583–596. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources