Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):375.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1230-5.

Long head BIceps TEnodesis or tenotomy in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: BITE study protocol

Derek Friedrich Petrus van Deurzen  1 , Vanessa Antoinet Bernice Scholtes  2 , Nienke Willemien Willigenburg  2 , Navin Gurnani  2 , Lukas Pieter Eduard Verweij  2 , Michel Pieter Jozef van den Bekerom  2 ; BITE collaboration group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long head BIceps TEnodesis or tenotomy in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: BITE study protocol

Derek Friedrich Petrus van Deurzen et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Optimal treatment of the diseased long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon during rotator cuff repair remains a topic of debate: tenotomy or tenodesis. A recent meta analysis revealed no difference in strength or functional outcome between treatments. The included studies varied in methodological quality, and only two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As strong evidence in favor of either tenotomy or tenodesis is still lacking, we designed this randomized controlled trial to compare functional outcomes after tenotomy and tenodesis when performed in adjunct to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods: Patients older than 50 years with a supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon rupture sized smaller than 3 cm, who are encountered with LHB pathology, will be randomized to either LHB tenotomy or LHB tenodesis. Clinical and patient-reported data will be collected pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after surgery. Primary outcome is overall shoulder function evaluated with the Constant score at 1 year after surgery. As additional measures of shoulder function, two patient reported outcomes (the Dutch Oxford Shoulder Test and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) will be assessed. Other evaluations include cosmetic appearance evaluated by the "Popeye" deformity, elbow flexion strength, arm cramping pain, MRI-based location of the biceps tendon, quality of life, and duration of surgery. To detect non-inferiority with a one-sided, two-sample t-test with 80 % power and a significance level (alpha) of 0.025, the required sample size is 98 patients.

Discussion: Treatment of LHB tendon lesions is performed differently around the world and meta analyses do not provide conclusive evidence in favor of one of these treatments. This study will strengthen evidence on the risks and benefits of LHB tenotomy and tenodesis in adjunct to a rotator cuff repair, which is important for managing patient expectations.

Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register ( NTR3255 ) January 12, 2012, ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02655848 ) January 14, 2016, retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Arthroscopy; Functional result; Long head biceps tendon; Randomised controlled trial; Rotator cuff.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Smiley scale. Legend: Indicating patient satisfaction with cosmetic appearance of their operated arm
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nove-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(3):238–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Boileau P, Levigne C. Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(2):100–8. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90218-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball C, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon: Why and when to do it. Tech Should Elbow Surg. 2001;2(3):140–52. doi: 10.1097/00132589-200109000-00002. - DOI
    1. Koh KH, Ahn JH, Kim SM, Yoo JC. Treatment of biceps tendon lesions in the setting of rotator cuff tears: prospective cohort study of tenotomy versus tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(8):1584–90. doi: 10.1177/0363546510364053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim SH, Yoo JC. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using interference screw: end-tunnel technique. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1405. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data