Long-Term Donor Outcomes after Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Living Donor Nephrectomy: Focus on Pregnancy Rates, Hypertension and Quality of Life
- PMID: 27577572
- DOI: 10.1159/000447064
Long-Term Donor Outcomes after Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Living Donor Nephrectomy: Focus on Pregnancy Rates, Hypertension and Quality of Life
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to compare long-term donor outcomes after open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. The focus was on pregnancy rates, hypertension and quality of life parameters.
Materials and methods: Data were retrospectively collected using our institution's electronic database and a structured questionnaire. The study included 30 donors after open donor nephrectomy (ODN) and 131 donors after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN).
Results: Demographic data did not differ between groups. When asked for their preference, significantly more donors in the LDN group would choose the same surgical approach again. The overall frequency of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the LDN group. The incidence of grade III complications was 2% after LDN and 10% after ODN (p = 0.79). Only 2 out of 15 female donors aged between 18 and 45 years delivered a healthy child after DN. On interview, only 4 out of 15 female donors declared the desire to have children after DN.
Conclusions: From the donor perspective, long-term outcomes after LDN are more favorable than after ODN. To ensure favorable functional outcomes, strict preoperative donor selection and diligent long-term donor follow-up are required.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.Am J Transl Res. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):5993-6002. eCollection 2020. Am J Transl Res. 2020. PMID: 33194009 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Living Donor Nephrectomy at a Single Center: Long-term Outcomes With 4 Different Techniques in Greater Than 4000 Donors Over 50 Years.Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1299-305. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001251. Transplantation. 2016. PMID: 27136265
-
Long-term outcomes of living donor kidney transplants in pediatric recipients following laparoscopic vs. open donor nephrectomy.Pediatr Transplant. 2012 Dec;16(8):894-900. doi: 10.1111/petr.12008. Pediatr Transplant. 2012. PMID: 23131058
-
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x. BJU Int. 2005. PMID: 15794797 Clinical Trial.
-
Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17868736 Review.
Cited by
-
From Lumbotomy to Robotic surgery: Narrative review of comparative studies of Surgical techniques in living donor nephrectomy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04611-1. Online ahead of print. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40531351 Review.
-
Living Kidney Donation: A Narrative Review of Mid- and Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes.Transplantation. 2025 Feb 1;109(2):259-272. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005094. Epub 2024 Jun 18. Transplantation. 2025. PMID: 38886889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.Am J Transl Res. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):5993-6002. eCollection 2020. Am J Transl Res. 2020. PMID: 33194009 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance.Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2360-2380. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17122. Epub 2022 Aug 3. Am J Transplant. 2022. PMID: 35716049 Free PMC article.
-
Is a Retroaortic Vein a Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy?Urol Int. 2020;104(7-8):641-645. doi: 10.1159/000507642. Epub 2020 May 15. Urol Int. 2020. PMID: 32417839 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources