A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
- PMID: 27578756
- PMCID: PMC4999552
- DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01256-16
A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
Abstract
The American Academy of Microbiology convened a colloquium to discuss problems in the biological sciences, with emphasis on identifying mechanisms to improve the quality of research. Participants from various disciplines made six recommendations: (i) design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria to recognize and reward high-quality scientific research; (ii) require universal training in good scientific practices, appropriate statistical usage, and responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists; (iii) establish open data at the timing of publication as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise; (iv) encourage scientific journals to publish negative data that meet methodologic standards of quality; (v) agree upon common criteria among scientific journals for retraction of published papers, to provide consistency and transparency; and (vi) strengthen research integrity oversight and training. These recommendations constitute an actionable framework that, in combination, could improve the quality of biological research.
Copyright © 2016 Casadevall et al.
Comment in
-
Improving Microbiology Research: the Problems Are Less Statistical and More Biological.mBio. 2016 Oct 18;7(5):e01634-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01634-16. mBio. 2016. PMID: 27795398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to "Improving Microbiology Research: the Problems Are Less Statistical and More Biological".mBio. 2016 Oct 18;7(5):e01680-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01680-16. mBio. 2016. PMID: 27795401 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):327-355. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30810892 Free PMC article.
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721281
-
Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.Circ Res. 2015 Jan 2;116(1):116-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819. Circ Res. 2015. PMID: 25552691 Review.
-
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744291
-
Quality really matters: the need to improve specimen quality in biomedical research.J Pathol. 2012 Dec;228(4):431-3. doi: 10.1002/path.4117. J Pathol. 2012. PMID: 23023660
Cited by
-
Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication.BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 15;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5. BMC Res Notes. 2022. PMID: 35570294 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology.Elife. 2021 Dec 7;10:e71601. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71601. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34874005 Free PMC article.
-
Ten simple rules for providing effective bioinformatics research support.PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Mar 26;16(3):e1007531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007531. eCollection 2020 Mar. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020. PMID: 32214318 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Microbiology Research: the Problems Are Less Statistical and More Biological.mBio. 2016 Oct 18;7(5):e01634-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01634-16. mBio. 2016. PMID: 27795398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Identifying and Overcoming Threats to Reproducibility, Replicability, Robustness, and Generalizability in Microbiome Research.mBio. 2018 Jun 5;9(3):e00525-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00525-18. mBio. 2018. PMID: 29871915 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources