Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:6392472.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6392472. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

Rotating Scheimpflug Imaging Indices in Different Grades of Keratoconus

Affiliations

Rotating Scheimpflug Imaging Indices in Different Grades of Keratoconus

Sherine S Wahba et al. J Ophthalmol. 2016.

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate accuracy of various Keratoconus (KC) screening indices, in relation to Topographic Keratoconus (TKC) grading. Setting. Al Watany Eye Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Methods. Data of 103 normal (group 1) and 73 KC eyes (group 2), imaged by Pentacam (branded as Allegro Oculyzer), were analysed. Group 2 was divided into 2a: 14 eyes (TKC = 1, early KC), 2b: 25 eyes (TKC = 1 to 2 or 2, moderate KC), and 2c: 34 eyes (TKC = 2 to 3 up to 4, severe KC). Participants were followed up for six years to confirm diagnosis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for evaluated curvature, elevation, and pachymetry indices with various reference shapes at different diameters. Results. When comparing normal to KC eyes, ten indices had significantly higher AUROC. Only five of them had significantly higher AUROC in early KC compared to normal corneas: Pachymetry Progression Index- (PPI-) Maximum (Max), Ambrósio's Relational Thickness- (ART-) Max, PPI-Max minus PPI-Minimum (Min), central corneal thickness (CCT), and diagonal decentration of thinnest point from the apex (AUROC = 0.690, 0.690, 0.687, 0.683, and 0.674, resp.). Conclusion. Generally, ten pachymetry and elevation-based indices had significantly higher AUROC. Five indices had statistically significant high AUROC when comparing early KC to normal corneas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambrósio R., Jr., Caiado A. L. C., Guerra F. P., et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2011;27(10):753–758. doi: 10.3928/1081597x-20110721-01. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belin M. W., Litoff D., Strods S. J., Winn S. S., Smith R. S. The PAR technology corneal topography system. Refractive and Corneal Surgery. 1992;8(1):88–96. - PubMed
    1. Smolek M. K. What is keratoconus? In: Boxer Wachler B. S., editor. Modern Management of Keratoconus. 1st. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2008. p. p. 3.
    1. Ambrósio R., Dawson D. G., Belin M. W. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;158(6):1358–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reinstein D. Z., Archer T. J., Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2009;25(7):604–610. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090610-06. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources