Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;16(6):419-426.
doi: 10.1007/s40256-016-0184-1.

Multivessel Revascularization Does Not Increase Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Incidence in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Multivessel Revascularization Does Not Increase Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Incidence in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

Bertrand N Mukete et al. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies and meta-analysis have shown that complete revascularization (CR) compared with infarct-related artery revascularization (IRA) during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with decreased mortality. However, it is unclear if CR versus IRA in STEMI during indexed hospitalization is associated with risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).

Methods: A database search was conducted for all randomized controlled trials that enrolled STEMI patients and compared CR versus IRA and reported CI-AKI. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0 (Wiley, Chichester) was used to determine summary effect size with a fixed-effect model and expressed as a risk ratio with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results: A total of four trials were identified and had a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 9.9 months, a total sample size of 1537, a mean age of 63.8 ± 1.2 versus 64.2 ± 2.1 years, 31.2 ± 5.3 versus 30.1 ± 4.7 % three-vessel disease, and 33.7 ± 4.1 versus 37.2 ± 4.5 % anterior STEMI in the CR versus IRA groups, respectively. A total of 276.7 ± 25.2 versus 186.7 ± 15.3 mL contrast was used in the CR versus IRA respectively (p = 0.006). There were no statistical significant differences between the two groups in the reported incidence of CI-AKI (1.3 % CR vs. 1.9 % IRA; p = 0.4), major bleeding (1.7 % CR vs. 2.5 % IRA; p = 0.4) and stroke (1.1 % CR vs. 0.4 % IRA; p = 0.24). However, there was a significantly increased incidence of cardiovascular death (2.0 % CR vs. 4.7 % IRA; p = 0.01) and ischemia-driven revascularization (6.2 % CR vs. 18.3 % IRA; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: In the index hospitalization, CR in STEMI patients is associated with significant risk reduction in cardiac death and revascularization and a non-significant reduced trend of CI-AKI, despite increased use of contrast when compared with IRA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources