Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;15(3):366-373.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 28.

Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004-2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry

Salih Samo  1 , Dustin A Carlson  1 , Dyanna L Gregory  1 , Susan H Gawel  2 , John E Pandolfino  1 , Peter J Kahrilas  3
Affiliations

Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004-2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry

Salih Samo et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background & aims: Reported global incidence and prevalence values for achalasia vary widely, from 0.03 to 1.63 per 100,000 persons per year and from 1.8 to 12.6 per 100,000 persons per year, respectively. This study aimed to reconcile these low values with findings from a major referral center, in central Chicago (which began using high-resolution manometry in 2004 and used it in all clinical studies since 2005), and has determined the incidence and prevalence of achalasia to be much greater.

Methods: We collected data from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse database (tertiary care setting) of adults residing in Chicago with an encounter diagnosis of achalasia from 2004 through 2014. Patient files were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and residential address. US Census Bureau population data were used as the population denominator. We assumed that we encountered every incident case in the city to calculate incidence and prevalence estimates. Data were analyzed for the city at large and for the 13 zip codes surrounding the Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), the NMH neighborhood.

Results: We identified 379 cases (50.9% female) that met the full inclusion criteria; of these, 246 were incident cases. Among these, 132 patients resided in the NMH neighborhood, 89 of which were incident cases. Estimated yearly incidences were stable over the study period, ranging from 0.77 to 1.35 per 100,000 citywide (average, 1.07 per 100,000) and from 1.41 to 4.60 per 100,000 in the NMH neighborhood (average, 2.92 per 100,000). The corresponding prevalence values increased progressively, from 4.68 to 14.42 per 100,000 citywide and from 15.64 to 32.58 per 100,000 in the NMH neighborhood.

Conclusions: The incidence and prevalence of achalasia in central Chicago diagnosed using state-of-the-art technology and diagnostic criteria are at least 2- to 3-fold greater than previous estimates. Additional studies are needed to determine the generalizability of these data to other regions.

Keywords: Achalasia; Epidemiology; Incidence; Prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest/financial disclosure: Salih Samo, Dustin A. Carlson, Dyanna L. Gregory, Susan H. Gawel, and Peter J. Kahrilas have nothing to disclose. John E. Pandolfino: Medtronic (Consultant, Grant, Speaking), Sandhill Scientific (Consulting, Speaking), Takeda (Speaking), Astra Zeneca (Speaking).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the NMH Neighborhood (thick line) and the city of Chicago (thin line) along with the locations of major academic and community medical centers in the city.
Figures 2
Figures 2
Histogram of age distribution of incident cases in Chicago (Panel A) and the NMH Neighborhood (Panel B) during the entire study period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incidence rates for Chicago and the NMH neighborhood with 95% CIs (Panel A: Total, Panel B: Females, Panel C: Males). CI: confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prevalence rates for Chicago and the NMH Neighborhood with 95% CIs (Panel A: Total, Panel B: Females, Panel C: Males). CI: confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Revisiting Epidemiologic Features of Achalasia.
    Boeckxstaens GE. Boeckxstaens GE. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):374-375. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 5. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 27826030 No abstract available.

References

    1. Stein CM, Gelfand M, Taylor HG. Achalasia in Zimbabwean blacks. S Afr Med J. 1985;67:261–2. - PubMed
    1. Ho KY, Tay HH, Kang JY. A prospective study of the clinical features, manometric findings, incidence and prevalence of achalasia in Singapore. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;14:791–5. - PubMed
    1. Birgisson S, Richter JE. Achalasia in Iceland, 1952–2002: an epidemiologic study. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1855–60. - PubMed
    1. Earlam RJ, Ellis FH, Jr, Nobrega FT. Achalasia of the esophagus in a small urban community. Mayo Clin Proc. 1969;44:478–83. - PubMed
    1. Galen EA, Switz DM, Zfass AM. Achalasia: incidence and treatment in Virginia. Va Med. 1982;109:183–6. - PubMed

Publication types