Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;159(3):527-34.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3964-z. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

A collaborative approach to cancer risk assessment services using genetic counselor extenders in a multi-system community hospital

Affiliations

A collaborative approach to cancer risk assessment services using genetic counselor extenders in a multi-system community hospital

Stephanie A Cohen et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a unique approach to cancer risk assessment for improved access by smaller rural communities.

Methods: Local, on-site nurse navigators were trained and utilized as genetic counselor extenders (GCEs) to provide basic risk assessment and offer BRCA1/2 genetic testing to select patients based on a triaging process in collaboration with board-certified genetic counselors (CGCs).

Results: From August 2012 to July 2014, 12,477 family history questionnaires representing 8937 unique patients presenting for a screening mammogram or new oncology appointment were triaged. Of these, 8.2 % patients were identified at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer, and 4.2 % were identified at increased risk for other hereditary causes of cancer. A total of 75 of 1130 at-risk patients identified (6.6 %) completed a genetic risk assessment appointment; 23 with a GCE and 52 with a CGC. A review of the completed genetic test requisition forms from a 9-year pre-collaboration time period found that 16 % (20/125) did not appear to meet genetic testing criteria. Overall, there was a fourfold increase in patients accessing genetic services in this study period compared to the pre-collaboration time period. Efficiency of this model was assessed by determining time spent by the CGC in all activities related to the collaboration, which amounted to approximately 16 h/month. Adjustments have been made and the program continues to be monitored for opportunities to improve efficiency.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of CGCs and GCEs collaborating to improve access to quality services in an efficient manner.

Keywords: Access; Genetic counseling; Genetic counselor extenders; Hereditary cancer risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer