Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016;57(2):E75-80.

Measuring and benchmarking the quality of two different organizational ways in delivering infant vaccination

Affiliations
Review

Measuring and benchmarking the quality of two different organizational ways in delivering infant vaccination

M Maurici et al. J Prev Med Hyg. 2016.

Abstract

The aim of this study was the quality of service evaluation of two different organizational ways in delivering infant vaccination according to a Regional Vaccination Plan. Eleven vaccination centres were selected in two Local Health Units (ASLs) belonging to the Regional Health Service of the Lazio Region, Italy. The services offering paediatric vaccinations for children under three years of age, delivered without an appointment (VACP) or with the need for an appointment (VACL), were investigated. The quality aspects under evaluation were communicational efficiency, organisational efficiency and comfort. Subjective data were collected from different stakeholders and involve the elicitation of best and worst feasible performance conditions for the ASLs when delivering VACP/VACL services. Objective data consists in the observation of current performances of the selected vaccination centres. Quality scorecards were obtained from the combination of all data. Benchmarking between VACP and VACL, i.e., two different organisational ways in delivering infant vaccination, can be performed as a result of the probabilistic meaning of the evaluated scores. An expert of vaccination services, i.e., a virtual combination of patients, doctors and nurses, claims the quality of service delivery of the ASLs under investigation with probability 78.03% and 69.67% for VACP and VACL, respectively. In other words, for short, the quality scores of the ASLs were 78.03% for VACP and 69.67% for VACL. Furthermore our results show how to practically improve the current service delivery. The QuaVaTAR approach can result in improvements of the quality of the ASLs for the two different ways of delivering paediatric vaccinations in a simple and intuitive way.

Keywords: Health Services Administration; Quality of Healthcare; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: A multiple- Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Rating. 1988;1:12–40.
    1. Ravichandran K, Tamil Mani B, Arun Kuma S, Prabhakara S. Influence of service quality on customer satisfaction: application of servqual model. Int J Business Manag. 2010;4:117–124.
    1. Lin DJ, Sheu IC, Pai JY, Bair A, Hung CY, Yeh YH, Chou MJ. Measuring patient's expectation and the perception of quality in LASIK services. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:63–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in healthcare. BMJ. 2004;328:360–361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan M, Skåtun D. Modelling non-demanders in choice experiments. Health Econ. 2004;13:397–402. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources