Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;6(2):90-4.
doi: 10.1177/1758573214526364. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Intraoperative nerve monitoring during total shoulder arthroplasty surgery

Affiliations

Intraoperative nerve monitoring during total shoulder arthroplasty surgery

Atif A Malik et al. Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Nerve injury is an acknowledged complication of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Although the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit has been reported to be between 1% and 16%, the true incidence of nerve damage is considered to be higher. The present study aimed to identify the rate of intraoperative nerve injury during total shoulder arthroplasty and to determine potential risk factors.

Methods: A prospective study of nerve conduction in 21 patients who underwent primary or revision TSA was carried out over a 12-month period. Nerve conduction was monitored by measuring intraoperative sensory evoked potentials (SEP). A significant neurophysiological signal change was defined as either a unilateral or bilateral decrease in SEP signal of ≥50%, a latency increase of ≥10% or a change in waveform morphology, not caused by operative or anaesthetic technique.

Results: Seven (33%) patients had a SEP signal change. The only significant risk factor identified for signal change was male sex (odds ratio 15.00, 95% confidence interval). The median nerve was the most affected nerve in the operated arm. All but one signal change returned to normal before completion of the operation and no patient had a persisting postoperative clinical neurological deficit.

Conclusions: The incidence of intraoperative nerve damage may be more common than previously reported. However, the loss of SEP signal is reversible and does not correlate with persisting clinical neurological deficits. The median nerve appears to be most at risk. Monitoring SEPs in the operated limb during TSA may be a valuable tool during TSA.

Keywords: Intraoperative nerve monitoring; nerve injury; shoulder arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nagda SH, Rogers KJ, Sestokas AK, et al. Neer Award 2005: peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 2S–8S. - PubMed
    1. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2279–2292. - PubMed
    1. Boardman ND, Cofield RH. Neurologic complications of shoulder surgery. Clin Ortho Relat Res 1999; 368: 44–53. - PubMed
    1. Lynch NM, Cofield RH, Silbert PL, Hermann RC. Neurologic complications after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 53–61. - PubMed
    1. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Current concepts review–complications of total shoulder replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 603–616. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources