Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;8(5):396-406.
doi: 10.1177/1758834016654902. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Neurokinin-1 inhibitors in the prevention of nausea and vomiting from highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Neurokinin-1 inhibitors in the prevention of nausea and vomiting from highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis

Omar Abdel-Rahman. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

A network meta-analysis of the comparative effectiveness of neurokinin 1 (NK-1) inhibitors in the prophylaxis of highly emetogenic chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting has been conducted. Eligible studies included randomized trials evaluating aprepitant, fosaprepitant, netupitant (NEPA), casopitant and rolapitant containing regimens in the setting of highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Primary outcomes of interest include complete response (CR) and rate of no significant nausea. After preclusion of ineligible studies, 19 studies were included in the final analysis. The majority of the regimens containing NK-1 inhibitors (including NEPA, aprepitant/palonosetron (palono)/dexamethasone (dexa), casopitant/granisetron (grani) or ondansetron (ondan)/dexa, aprepitant/ondan/dexa) are better than regimens not containing them (palono/dexa, ondan/dexa, grani/dexa) in terms of achieving a CR in the overall phase. Moreover, casopitant/grani or ondan/dexa and aprepitant/grani or ondan/dexa are better than rolapitant/ondan or grani/dexa in terms of CR achievement [odds ratio (OR) 1.62, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.14-2.23, and OR 1.28, 95% CrI 1.01-1.59, respectively]. Taking into consideration the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, regimens containing neurokinin inhibitors are associated with higher CR rates than regimens not containing them. Moreover, casopitant and aprepitant regimens seem to be more effective than rolapitant regimens.

Keywords: chemotherapy; nausea; neurokinin; vomiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of study selection procedure.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Forest plots of odds ratio (OR) of complete response (CR) associated with different neurokinin-based regimens. (b) League table of different neurokinin-based regimens in terms of CR achievement. (c) Rankogram of different neurokinin-based regimens in terms of CR achievement. CI, credible interval; dexa, dexamethasone; grani, granisetron; ondan, ondansetron; NEPA, netupitant/palonosetron; palono, palonosetron.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Forest plots of odds ratio (OR) of rate of no significant nausea associated with different neurokinin-based regimens. (b) League table of different neurokinin-based regimens in terms of rate of no significant nausea achievement. (c) Rankogram of different neurokinin-based regimens in terms of rate of no significant nausea achievement. CI, credible interval; dexa, dexamethasone; grani, granisetron; ondan, ondansetron; NEPA, netupitant/palonosetron; palono, palonosetron.

References

    1. Aapro M., Carides A., Rapoport B., Schmoll H., Zhang L., Warr D. (2015) Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist 20: 450–458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aapro M., Grunberg S., Manikhas G., Olivares G., Suarez T., Tjulandin S., et al. (2006) A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of palonosetron compared with ondansetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 17: 1441–1449. - PubMed
    1. Ando Y., Hayashi T., Ito K., Suzuki E., Mine N., Miyamoto A., et al. (2015) Comparison between 5-day aprepitant and single-dose fosaprepitant meglumine for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24: 871–878. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caldwell D., Ades A., Higgins J. (2005) Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 331: 897–900. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Wit R., Herrstedt J., Rapoport B., Carides A., Carides G., Elmer M., et al. (2003) Addition of the oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 21: 4105–4111. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources