Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 26;3(2):85-8.
doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw001. eCollection 2016 Jul.

Hip arthroscopy: a report on a cohort of orthopaedic surgeons

Affiliations

Hip arthroscopy: a report on a cohort of orthopaedic surgeons

J W Thomas Byrd et al. J Hip Preserv Surg. .

Abstract

Successful hip arthroscopy depends on proper patient selection and reasonable patient expectations. The purpose of this study is to report the results of hip arthroscopy in orthopaedic surgeons who represent the most informed cohort. This report is based on a retrospective review of prospectively collected data among 24 orthopaedic surgeons (1 bilateral). Follow-up averaged 48 months (range 12-120 months). They were all males with an average age of 45 years (range 30-64 years). All improved with an average of 18 points (preoperative 75; post-operative 93); although one underwent repeat arthroscopy and one was converted to total hip arthroplasty at 54 months. There were numerous diagnoses and procedures performed and one complication (acute coronary artery occlusion). They resumed seeing patients at an average of 1.6 weeks (range 2 days-4 weeks) and operating at an average of 3.1 weeks (range 6 days-8 weeks). This report spans three decades, thus representing a heterogeneous population in terms of diagnoses and treatment. Nonetheless, successful results are noted. As a cohort, orthopaedic surgeons possess the greatest insight into hip arthroscopy, but as patients, often they must modulate their expectations in order to match the understanding of the realities of the procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Average mHHS scores over time J.W.T.B

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14: 433–44. - PubMed
    1. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 35–43. - PubMed
    1. Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 457–62. - PubMed
    1. Aalderink KJ, Shaffer M, Amendola A. Rehabilitation following high tibial osteotomy. Clin Sports Med 2010; 29: 291–301. - PubMed
    1. Barber FA. Accelerated rehabilitation for meniscus repairs. Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 206–10. - PubMed