Hip arthroscopy: a report on a cohort of orthopaedic surgeons
- PMID: 27583146
- PMCID: PMC5005046
- DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnw001
Hip arthroscopy: a report on a cohort of orthopaedic surgeons
Abstract
Successful hip arthroscopy depends on proper patient selection and reasonable patient expectations. The purpose of this study is to report the results of hip arthroscopy in orthopaedic surgeons who represent the most informed cohort. This report is based on a retrospective review of prospectively collected data among 24 orthopaedic surgeons (1 bilateral). Follow-up averaged 48 months (range 12-120 months). They were all males with an average age of 45 years (range 30-64 years). All improved with an average of 18 points (preoperative 75; post-operative 93); although one underwent repeat arthroscopy and one was converted to total hip arthroplasty at 54 months. There were numerous diagnoses and procedures performed and one complication (acute coronary artery occlusion). They resumed seeing patients at an average of 1.6 weeks (range 2 days-4 weeks) and operating at an average of 3.1 weeks (range 6 days-8 weeks). This report spans three decades, thus representing a heterogeneous population in terms of diagnoses and treatment. Nonetheless, successful results are noted. As a cohort, orthopaedic surgeons possess the greatest insight into hip arthroscopy, but as patients, often they must modulate their expectations in order to match the understanding of the realities of the procedure.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Hip arthroscopy in the warrior athlete: 2 to 10 year outcomes.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Jan 11;3(1):68-71. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv077. eCollection 2016 Apr. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016. PMID: 27026823 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2000 Sep;16(6):578-87. doi: 10.1053/jars.2000.7683. Arthroscopy. 2000. PMID: 10976117
-
Revision Hip Arthroscopy After Labral Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Autograft: Surgical Findings and Comparison of Outcomes With Labral Reconstructions Not Requiring Revision.Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1244-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.054. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29456067
-
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):488-500. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749475. Epub 2018 Jan 26. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 29373805
-
Does Prior Hip Arthroscopy Affect Outcomes of Subsequent Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):631-643. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.055. Epub 2019 Jan 4. Arthroscopy. 2019. PMID: 30612772
Cited by
-
What do we mean when we say an operation works?J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Jun 10;3(2):83-4. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw019. eCollection 2016 Jul. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016. PMID: 27583145 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14: 433–44. - PubMed
-
- Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 35–43. - PubMed
-
- Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 457–62. - PubMed
-
- Aalderink KJ, Shaffer M, Amendola A. Rehabilitation following high tibial osteotomy. Clin Sports Med 2010; 29: 291–301. - PubMed
-
- Barber FA. Accelerated rehabilitation for meniscus repairs. Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 206–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials