Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 8:4:441-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.08.006. eCollection 2016 Dec.

A bibliographic review of public health dissemination and implementation research output and citation rates

Affiliations

A bibliographic review of public health dissemination and implementation research output and citation rates

Luke Wolfenden et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the research output and citation rates (academic impact) of public health dissemination and implementation research according to research design and study type. A cross sectional bibliographic study was undertaken in 2013. All original data-based studies and review articles focusing on dissemination and implementation research that had been published in 10 randomly selected public health journals in 2008 were audited. The electronic database 'Scopus' was used to calculate 5-year citation rates for all included publications. Of the 1648 publications examined, 216 were original data-based research or literature reviews focusing on dissemination and implementation research. Of these 72% were classified as descriptive/epidemiological, 26% were intervention and just 1.9% were measurement research. Cross-sectional studies were the most common study design (47%). Reviews, randomized trials, non-randomized trials and decision/cost-effectiveness studies each represented between 6 and 10% of all output. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were the most frequently cited study designs. The study suggests that publications that had the greatest academic impact (highest citation rates) made up only a small proportion of overall public health dissemination and implementation research output.

Keywords: Bibliographic; Citation; Design; Dissemination; Implementation; Public health; Research output.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2013;64(2):217–233.
    1. Eccles M., Grimshaw J., Campbell M., Ramsay C. Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(1):47–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasgow R.E., Vinson C., Chambers D., Khoury M.J., Kaplan R.M., Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am. J. Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–1281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni A.V., Aziz B., Shams I., Busse J.W. Comparisons of citations in web of science, scopus, and google scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092–1096. - PubMed
    1. Mercer S.L., DeVinney B.J., Fine L.J., Green L.W., Dougherty D. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: identifying trade-offs. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007;33(2):139–154. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources