Wounds research for patient benefit: a 5-year programme of research
- PMID: 27583319
- Bookshelf ID: NBK379923
- DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04130
Wounds research for patient benefit: a 5-year programme of research
Excerpt
Background: Complex wounds are those that heal by secondary intention and include lower-limb ulcers, pressure ulcers and some surgical wounds. The care of people with complex wounds is costly, with care mainly being delivered by community nurses. There is a lack of current, high-quality data regarding the numbers and types of people affected, care received and outcomes achieved.
Objectives: To (1) assess how high-quality data about complex wounds can be captured effectively for use in both service planning and research while ensuring integration with current clinical data collection systems and minimal impact on staff time; (2) investigate whether or not a clinical register of people with complex wounds could give valid estimates of treatment effects, thus reducing dependence on large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (3) identify the most important research questions and outcomes for people with complex wounds from the perspectives of patients, carers and health-care professionals; (4) evaluate the potential contributions to decision-making of individual patient data meta-analysis and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis; and (5) complete and update systematic reviews in topic areas of high priority.
Methods: To meet objectives 1 and 2 we conducted a prevalence survey and developed and piloted a longitudinal disease register. A consultative, deliberative method and in-depth interviews were undertaken to address objective 3. To address objectives 4 and 5 we conducted systematic reviews including mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.
Results: From the prevalence survey we estimated the point prevalence of all complex wounds to be 1.47 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 1.38 to 1.56 per 1000 people). Pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers were the most common type of complex wound. A total of 195 people with a complex wound were recruited to a complex wounds register pilot. We established the feasibility of correctly identifying, extracting and transferring routine NHS data into the register; however, participant recruitment, data collection and tracking individual wounds in people with multiple wounds were challenging. Most patients and health professionals regarded healing of the wound as the primary treatment goal. Patients were greatly troubled by the social consequences of having a complex wound. Complex wounds are frequently a consequence of, and are themselves, a long-term condition but treatment is usually focused on healing the wound. Consultative, deliberative research agenda setting on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment with patients, carers and clinicians yielded 960 treatment uncertainties and a top 12 list of research priorities. Of 167 RCTs of complex wound treatments in a systematic review of study quality, 41% did not specify a primary outcome and the overall quality of the conduct and reporting of the research was poor. Mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis in areas of high priority identified that matrix hydrocolloid dressings had the highest probability (70%) of being the most effective dressing for diabetic foot ulcers, whereas a hyaluronan fleece dressing had the highest probability (35%) of being the most effective dressing for venous ulcers; however, the quality of this evidence was low and uncertainty is high.
Conclusions: Complex wounds are common and costly with a poor evidence base for many frequent clinical decisions. There is little routine clinical data collection in community nursing. A prospective complex wounds register has the potential to both assist clinical decision-making and provide important research evidence but would be challenging to implement without investment in information technology in NHS community services. Future work should focus on developing insights into typical wound healing trajectories, identifying factors that are prognostic for healing and assessing the cost-effectiveness of selected wound treatments.
Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016. This work was produced by Cullum et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Sections
- Plain English summary
- Scientific summary
- Chapter 1. Introduction
- Chapter 2. Data capture and epidemiology (workstream 1)
- Chapter 3. Service user and provider perspectives (workstream 2)
- Chapter 4. Evidence synthesis for clinical decision-making (workstream 3)
- Chapter 5. Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendix 1 Prevalence survey proforma
- Appendix 2 Prevalence of complex wounds by age and sex: prevalence survey data
- Appendix 3 Medical data registries of chronic diseases: review protocol
- Appendix 4 Wound assessment form
- Appendix 5 James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Partnership voting sheet
- Appendix 6 James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Partnership pre-workshop questionnaire
- Appendix 7 Collation and scoping of research ideas for workstream 3
- Appendix 8 Search string used for MEDLINE: silver dressings for venous leg ulcers
- Appendix 9 Data extraction tables: silver dressings for venous leg ulcers
- Appendix 10 Dressings for foot ulcers in people with diabetes: search strategy
- Appendix 11 Quality assessment of mixed-treatment comparison estimates using iGRADE: comparison with the GRADE tool
- Appendix 12 Dressings for foot ulcers in people with diabetes: PRISMA flow chart
- Appendix 13 Dressings for venous leg ulcers: search strategy
- Appendix 14 Dressings for venous leg ulcers: PRISMA flow chart
- Appendix 15 Alternative mixed-treatment meta-analysis models explored
- List of abbreviations
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources