Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Bypass Surgery in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease
- PMID: 27585503
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.024
Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Bypass Surgery in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease
Abstract
Background: Currently available randomized data on the comparison between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary disease (LMD) lacks statistical power due to low numbers of patients enrolled.
Objectives: This study assessed long-term outcomes of PCI and CABG for the treatment of LMD in specific subgroups according to disease anatomic complexity.
Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of individual patient-level data of the LMD patients included in the PRECOMBAT (Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) trials. Incidences of major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 5 years follow-up.
Results: Study population comprised 1,305 patients. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years was 28.3% in the PCI group and 23.0% in the CABG group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.55; p = 0.045). This difference is mainly driven by a higher rate of repeat revascularization associated with PCI (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.38 to 2.47; p < 0.001). The 2 strategies showed similar rates of the safety composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (p = 0.45). In patients with isolated LM or LM + 1-vessel disease, PCI was associated with a 60% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.83; p = 0.029) and 67% reduction in cardiac mortality (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.88; p = 0.025) when compared with CABG.
Conclusions: In patients with unprotected LMD, CABG, and PCI result in similar rates of the safety composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In patients with isolated LM or LM + 1-vessel disease, PCI is associated with lower all-cause and cardiac mortality when compared to CABG.
Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; left main coronary artery disease; long-term outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; randomized controlled trials.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Myocardial Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Step Toward Individualized Treatment Selection.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1010-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.043. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27585504 No abstract available.
-
Percutaneous Revascularization of Left Main Disease: Could the Angiographic Follow-Up Improve the Survival?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 7;69(5):597-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.986. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28153115 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Percutaneous Revascularization of Left Main Disease: Could the Angiographic Follow-Up Improve the Survival?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 7;69(5):598. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.075. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28153116 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
