Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;27(1):327-338.
doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0016.

Disparities in Primary Care EHR Adoption Rates

Dominic Mack  1 , Shun Zhang  2 , Megan Douglas  2 , Charles Sow  3 , Harry Strothers  4 , George Rust  5
Affiliations

Disparities in Primary Care EHR Adoption Rates

Dominic Mack et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

This study evaluates electronic health record (EHR) adoption by primary care providers in Georgia to assess adoption disparities according to practice size and type, payer mix, and community characteristics. Frequency variances of EHR "Go Live" status were estimated. Odds ratios were calculated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Large practices and community health centers (CHCs) were more likely to Go Live (>80% EHR adoption) than rural health clinics and other underserved settings (53%). A significantly lower proportion (68.9%) of Medicaid predominant providers had achieved Go Live status and had a 47% higher risk of not achieving Go Live status than private insurance predominant practices. Disparities in EHR adoption rates may exacerbate existing disparities in health outcomes of patients served by these practices. Targeted support such as that provided to CHCs would level the playing field for practices now at a disadvantage.

Keywords: Health information technology; Medicaid; electronic health records; health disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Charles D, King J, Patel V, et al. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2012. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2013. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabrief9fnal.pdf.
    1. King J, Patel V, Furukawa MF. Physician adoption of electronic health record technology to meet meaningful use objectives: 2009–2012. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2012. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/onc-data-brief-7-december-2....
    1. Bruen BK, Ku L, Burke MF, et al. More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2011 Mar;30(3):472–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaf.2010.0932. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopez L, Green AR, Tan-McGrory A, et al. Bridging the digital divide in health care: the role of health information technology in addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Oct;37(10):437–45. - PubMed
    1. Gray BH, Bowden T, Johansen I, et al. Electronic health records: an international perspective on “meaningful use”. Issues in International Health Policy, The Common Wealth Fund. 2011 Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/∼/media/Files/Publications/Issue%20Brief.... - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources