Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;46(4):266-76.
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.266. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

Risk indicators related to peri-implant disease: an observational retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Risk indicators related to peri-implant disease: an observational retrospective cohort study

Pier Paolo Poli et al. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the influence of potential risk indicators on the development of peri-implant disease.

Methods: Overall, 103 patients referred for implant treatment from 2000 to 2012 were randomly enrolled. The study sample consisted of 421 conventional-length (>6 mm) non-turned titanium implants that were evaluated clinically and radiographically according to pre-established clinical and patient-related parameters by a single investigator. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis rank test and a logistic regression model were used for the statistical analysis of the recorded data at the implant level.

Results: The diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was made for 173 (41.1%) and 19 (4.5%) implants, respectively. Age (≥65 years), patient adherence (professional hygiene recalls <2/year) and the presence of plaque were associated with higher peri-implant probing-depth values and bleeding-on-probing scores. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P=0.001), patient adherence (P=0.03), the absence of keratinized tissue (P=0.03), implants placed in pristine bone (P=0.04), and the presence of peri-implant soft-tissue recession (P=0.000) were strongly associated with the event of peri-implantitis.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, patients aged ≥65 years and non-adherent subjects were more prone to develop peri-implant disease. Therefore, early diagnosis and a systematic maintenance-care program are essential for maintaining peri-implant tissue health, especially in older patients.

Keywords: Dental implants; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Peri-implantitis; Periodontal diseases; Retrospective study; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. In: Lang NP, Karring T, editors. Consensus report of session IV; Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology; London: Quintessence; 1994. pp. 365–369.
    1. Lindhe J, Meyle J, Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(Suppl):282–285. - PubMed
    1. Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications. J Periodontol. 2013;84:436–443. - PubMed
    1. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):178–181. - PubMed
    1. Sanz M, Chapple IL, Working Group 4 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology Clinical research on peri-implant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(Suppl 12):202–206. - PubMed