Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;32(1):42-51.
doi: 10.1159/000443653. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Affiliations
Review

Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Ulrike W Denzer. Visc Med. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The verbalisation of quality standards and parameters by medical societies are relevant for qualitative improvement but may also be an instrument to demand more resources for health care or be a unique characteristic. Within the health care system 3 different quality levels can be defined: structure, process and result quality.

Methods: The current S2k guideline of the German Society for Gastroenterology (quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy) AWMF registry no. 021-022 provides recommendations based on the available evidence for the structure quality (requirements for equipment, human resources) as well as for the process quality (patient preparation, conduct, documentation) and result quality (follow-up of specific endoscopic procedures).

Results: Based on these recommendations, measurable quality indicators/parameters for the endoscopy have been selected and formulated. General quality parameters for endoscopic examinations are given as well as quality parameters for specific procedures for the preparation, conduct, and follow-up of specific endoscopic interventions.

Conclusion: Only the regular review of processes and courses by means of defined measurement parameters builds up the basis for corrections based on facts. In addition, the implementation of recommended standards may be an instrument in demanding more resources from the health care system and, therefore, should be embedded as routine.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Guideline gastrointestinal endoscopy; Quality parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pasche F, Schrappe M. Qualtitätsmanagement: Begriffe und Konzept. Med Klin (Munich) 2001;96:497–502. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. Criteria and standards for quality assessment and monitoring. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1986;12:99–108. - PubMed
    1. S2k Guideline ‘Qualitätsanforderungen in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie’ www.dgvs.de.
    1. Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:3–16. - PubMed
    1. Cullinane M. Scoping our practice: The 2004 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths; 2004.