Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;28(3):367-374.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

Affiliations

An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

Sara S Webb et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth.

Methods: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS.

Results: A total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 - 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 - 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 - 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 - 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 - 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 - 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The 'prebirth variable' model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability.

Conclusions: Our model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event.

Keywords: Cohort study; OASIS; Predictor variables; Prognostic model; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

S.W. is partly funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) clinical doctoral fellowship (CDRF-2012-03-064).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval required.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Discriminatory ability of the OASIS – Prebirth Variables model at a 1 % OASIS probability cut-off value. Each ‘woman’ in the figure represents one woman counselled for risk of sustaining OASIS, and of these women, 25 will sustain OASIS (bold) and 975 will not (not bold). Grey-shaded cells indicate women deemed ‘at risk’. Unshaded cells indicate women deemed ‘not at risk’
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Discriminatory ability of the OASIS – Prebirth Variables model at a 10 % OASIS probability cut-off value. Each ‘woman’ in the figure represents one woman counselled for risk of sustaining OASIS, and of these women, 25 will sustain OASIS (bold) and 975 will not (not bold). Grey-shaded cells indicate women deemed ‘at risk’. Unshaded cells indicate women deemed ‘not at risk’

References

    1. Baghestan EIL, Bordahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:25–35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e2f50b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120:1516–25. - PubMed
    1. Marsh F, Lynne R, Christine L, Alison W. Obstetric anal sphincter injury in the UK and its effect on bowel, bladder and sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G. Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery – a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;27:27–32. - PubMed
    1. Sultan A, Thakar R, Fenner D. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma; diagnosis and clinical management. London: Springer; 2009.

Publication types