Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Oct 4;87(14):1501-1510.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003183. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

Recurrent stroke risk and cerebral microbleed burden in ischemic stroke and TIA: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Recurrent stroke risk and cerebral microbleed burden in ischemic stroke and TIA: A meta-analysis

Duncan Wilson et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine associations between cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden with recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk after IS or TIA.

Methods: We identified prospective studies of patients with IS or TIA that investigated CMBs and stroke (ICH and IS) risk during ≥3 months follow-up. Authors provided aggregate summary-level data on stroke outcomes, with CMBs categorized according to burden (single, 2-4, and ≥5 CMBs) and distribution. We calculated absolute event rates and pooled risk ratios (RR) using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: We included 5,068 patients from 15 studies. There were 115/1,284 (9.6%) recurrent IS events in patients with CMBs vs 212/3,781 (5.6%) in patients without CMBs (pooled RR 1.8 for CMBs vs no CMBs; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.5). There were 49/1,142 (4.3%) ICH events in those with CMBs vs 17/2,912 (0.58%) in those without CMBs (pooled RR 6.3 for CMBs vs no CMBs; 95% CI 3.5-11.4). Increasing CMB burden increased the risk of IS (pooled RR [95% CI] 1.8 [1.0-3.1], 2.4 [1.3-4.4], and 2.7 [1.5-4.9] for 1 CMB, 2-4 CMBs, and ≥5 CMBs, respectively) and ICH (pooled RR [95% CI] 4.6 [1.9-10.7], 5.6 [2.4-13.3], and 14.1 [6.9-29.0] for 1 CMB, 2-4 CMBs, and ≥5 CMBs, respectively).

Conclusions: CMBs are associated with increased stroke risk after IS or TIA. With increasing CMB burden (compared to no CMBs), the risk of ICH increases more steeply than that of IS. However, IS absolute event rates remain higher than ICH absolute event rates in all CMB burden categories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart of study selection
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) for presence of any cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) vs no CMBs
CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot of the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) for different burdens of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) vs no CMBs
CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest plot of the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) for different burdens of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) vs no CMBs
CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio.

References

    1. Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, et al. . Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:165–174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Roob G, et al. . Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:637–642. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanaka A, Ueno Y, Nakayama Y, Takano K, Takebayashi S. Small chronic hemorrhages and ischemic lesions in association with spontaneous intracerebral hematomas. Stroke 1999;30:1637–1642. - PubMed
    1. Knudsen KA, Rosand J, Karluk D, Greenberg SM. Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the Boston criteria. Neurology 2001;56:537–539. - PubMed
    1. Shoamanesh A, Kwok CS, Benavente O. Cerebral microbleeds: histopathological correlation of neuroimaging. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:528–534. - PubMed

Publication types