Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 2;17(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0136-y.

Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals?

Cristina M Beltran-Aroca  1 , Eloy Girela-Lopez  2 , Eliseo Collazo-Chao  2 , Manuel Montero-Pérez-Barquero  3 , Maria C Muñoz-Villanueva  4
Affiliations

Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals?

Cristina M Beltran-Aroca et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Respect for confidentiality is important to safeguard the well-being of patients and ensure the confidence of society in the doctor-patient relationship. The aim of our study is to examine real situations in which there has been a breach of confidentiality, by means of direct observation in clinical practice.

Methods: By means of direct observation, our study examines real situations in which there has been a breach of confidentiality in a tertiary hospital. To observe and collect data on these situations, we recruited students enrolled in the Medical Degree Program at the University of Cordoba. The observers recorded their entries on standardized templates during clinical internships in different departments: Internal Medicine; Gynecology and Obstetrics; Pediatrics; Emergency Medicine; General and Digestive Surgery; Maxillofacial Surgery; Plastic Surgery; Orthopedics and Traumatology; Digestive; Dermatology; Rheumatology; Mental Health; Nephrology; Pneumology; Neurology; and Ophthalmology.

Results: Following 7138 days and 33157 h of observation, we found an estimated Frequency Index of one breach per 62.5 h. As regards the typology of the observed breaches, the most frequent (54,6 %) were related to the consultation and/or disclosure of clinical and/or personal data to medical personnel not involved in the patient's clinical care, as well as people external to the hospital. As regards their severity, severe breaches were the most frequent, accounting for 46.7 % of all incidents. Most of the reported incidents were observed in public areas (37.9 %), such as corridors, elevators, the cafeteria, stairs, and locker rooms.

Conclusions: In addition to aspects related to hospital organization or infrastructure, we have shown that all healthcare personnel are involved in confidentiality breaches, especially physicians. While most are committed unintentionally, a non-negligible number are severe, repeated breaches (9.5 %), thus suggesting a certain carelessness, perhaps through ignorance about certain behaviors that can jeopardize patient confidentiality.

Keywords: Confidentiality/privacy; Professional ethics; Professional-patient relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency Index of confidentiality breaches observed in the medical departments (mean values; *: p < 0,001)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between area where confidentiality breaches were observed and medical departments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between area where confidentiality breaches were observed and personnel involved
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boyd KM. HIV infection and AIDS: the ethics of medical confidentiality. J Med Ethics. 1992;18(Suppl 4):173–179. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.4.173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleinman I, Baylis F, Rodgers S, Singer P. Bioethics for clinicians: 8. Confidentiality. CMAJ. 1997;156(4):521–524. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrese JA, Sugarman J. The inescapable relevance of bioethics for the practicing clinician. Chest. 2006;130(Suppl 6):1864–1872. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1864. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altisent R. Confidencialidad. In: Romeo CM, editor. Enciclopedia de Bioderecho y Bioética. Granada: Comares; 2011. pp. 425–430.
    1. Shapiro R. Breaking the code: is a promise always a promise? In: Kushner TK, Thomasma DC, editors. Ward Ethics: Dilemmas for Medical Students and Doctors in Training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. pp. 50–52.