Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Nov;64(11):2288-2295.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.14354. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs

J Brian Cassel et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the nonclinical outcomes of a proactive palliative care program funded and operated by a health system for Medicare Advantage plan beneficiaries.

Design: Observational, retrospective study using propensity-based matching.

Setting: A health system in southern California.

Participants: Individuals who received the intervention between 2007 and 2014 (n = 368) were matched with 1,075 comparison individuals within each of four disease groups: cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and dementia. All were known to be dead at the time of the retrospective study, were Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, and had 2 years of usage data before death. Median age at death for each disease group was older than 80.

Intervention: Home- and clinic-based palliative care (PC) services provided by a multidisciplinary team.

Measurements: Outcomes included hospital costs, other healthcare costs, readmission rates, hospital admissions and bed days, intensive care unit use in final 30 days of life, and death within 30 days of an admission.

Results: Intervention participants in all four disease groups had less hospital use and lower hospital costs nonintervention participants, which drove lower overall healthcare costs. In the final 6 months of life, healthcare costs for the intervention groups stayed largely the same from month to month, whereas costs for comparison participants increased dramatically.

Conclusion: In the context of an alternative payment model in which the provider was "at risk" of bearing the costs of care, a proactive PC program helped to avoid the escalation in hospital use and costs commonly seen in the final months of life.

Keywords: Medicare Advantage; costs; palliative care; serious illness; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Costs per participant per month for final 6 months of life. Costs per participant per month limited to Transitions participants enrolled for at least the last 6 months before death (n = 178; n = 10 cancer, n = 35 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), n = 91 heart failure (HF), n = 42 dementia) and their matched controls (n = 515; n = 30 cancer, n = 99 COPD, n = 260 HF, n = 126 dementia). The differences were statistically significant for the final 2 months of life. Transition program costs are not included.

References

    1. Rabow MW, Smith AK, Braun JL et al. Outpatient palliative care practices. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:654–655. - PubMed
    1. Rabow M, Kvale E, Barbour L et al. Moving upstream: A review of the evidence of the impact of outpatient palliative care. J Palliat Med 2013;16:1540–1549. - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V et al. Family perspectives on end‐of‐life care at the last place of care. JAMA 2004;291:88–93. - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Gozalo PL, Bynum JP et al. Change in end‐of‐life care for Medicare beneficiaries: Site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA 2013;309:470–477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirchhoff KT, Hammes BJ, Kehl KA et al. Effect of a disease‐specific advance care planning intervention on end‐of‐life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:946–950. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms