Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Sep 2;6(9):e012504.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012504.

Influence of habitual dietary fibre intake on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Influence of habitual dietary fibre intake on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study

Genelle Healey et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: The commensal gut microbiota have been shown to have an impact on human health as aberrant gut microbiota have been linked to disease. Dietary constituents are influential in shaping the gut microbiota. Diet-specific therapeutic strategies may therefore play a role in optimising human health via beneficial manipulation of the gut microbiota. Research has suggested that an individual's baseline gut microbiota composition may influence how the gut microbiota respond to a dietary intervention and individuals with differing habitual dietary intakes appear to have distinct baseline gut microbiota compositions. The responsiveness of the gut microbiota may therefore be influenced by habitual dietary intakes. This study aims to investigate what influence differing habitual dietary fibre intakes have on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic intervention.

Methods and analysis: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study, 20 low dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake <18 g/day for females and <22 g/day for males) and 20 high dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake ≥25 g/day for females and ≥30 g/day for males) consumers will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to a placebo (Glucidex 29 Premium) or a prebiotic (Synergy 1) intervention for 3 weeks with a 3-week washout followed by 3 weeks of the alternative intervention. Outcome measures of gut microbiota composition (using 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and functional capacity (faecal short chain fatty acid concentrations and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt)) as well as appetite (visual analogue scale appetite questionnaire) will be assessed at the beginning and end of each intervention phase.

Ethics and dissemination: The Massey University Human Ethics Committee approved this study (Massey University HEC: Southern A application-15/34). Results will be disseminated through peer-review journal publications, conference presentations and a summary of findings will be distributed to participants.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12615000922572; Pre-results.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; Appetite; Gut microbiota; NUTRITION & DIETETICS; Prebiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram summarising the four separate study phases including the two possible intervention orders. The intervention orders may not be as described within the figure as they are blinded to the lead researcher, analysts and participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flow through the study including measurements, questionnaires and samples taken at each Human Nutrition Research Unit visit. BodPod, air displacement plethysmography; FI-FFQ, fructan intake food frequency questionnaire; IP, intervention phase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Candela M, Perna F, Carnevali P, et al. . Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production. Int J Food Microbiol 2008;125:286–92. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.04.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chow J, Lee SM, Shen Y, et al. . Host–bacterial symbiosis in health and disease. Adv Immunol 2010;107:243–74. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381300-8.00008-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonnenburg JL, Xu J, Leip DD, et al. . Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science 2005;307:1955–60. 10.1126/science.1109051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tappenden KA, Deutsch AS. The physiological relevance of the intestinal microbiota- contributions to human health. J Am Coll Nutr 2007;26:679S–83S. 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719647 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, et al. . Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006;444:1022–3. 10.1038/4441022a - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources