[Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them]
- PMID: 27593614
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.06.001
[Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them]
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize the indications of primary cesarean sections and discuss the various possibilities to reduce them.
Materials and methods: Retrospective study, carried out over a period of 1 year in a university hospital having a level 3 perinatal activity, including the 499 primary cesarean sections of 2013. Two groups were defined by parity: nulliparous patients (group 1) and multiparous patients who had never previously been delivered by cesarean section (group 2). We have assessed the indication of every primary cesarean section and health status of newborns in each group.
Results: Groups 1 and 2 respectively included 369 and 130 patients. The cesarean section rate in 2013 was 24.7% with a primary cesarean section rate of 17%. Seventy-four percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women and 26% on multiparous (P<0.001). Sixty-three percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery were non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing (47.1%), failure to progress (24.8%) for which nulliparous women were more involved (29% vs. 13%, P<0.001) and fetal malpresentation (9.6%).
Conclusion: Further analysis of fetal heart rate during labor, a larger use of second line means to evaluate the fetal status during labor, using 6cm as the cut off for active labor, and encouraging vaginal operative delivery constitute the best way to decrease the primary cesarean section rate.
Keywords: Anomalies du rythme cardiaque fœtal; Défaut de progression; Failure to progress; Fetal malpresentation; Non-reassuring fetal heart rate; Première césarienne; Primary cesarean delivery; Présentation dystocique.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):515.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 May 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27210064 Free PMC article.
-
Primary cesarean delivery in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23743454 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):191.e1-191.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30616966
-
[Impact of organizational factors on the cesarean delivery occurrence in a low-risk population].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30318361 Review. French.
-
Intraoperative fetal heart monitoring for non-obstetric surgery: A systematic review.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jul;238:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.033. Epub 2019 Apr 27. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31082738
Cited by
-
Teaching and performing audits on caesarean delivery reduce the caesarean delivery rate.PLoS One. 2018 Aug 27;13(8):e0202475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202475. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30148837 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical