Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;45(8):841-848.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

[Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them]

[Article in French]
Affiliations

[Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them]

[Article in French]
P Zelli et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the indications of primary cesarean sections and discuss the various possibilities to reduce them.

Materials and methods: Retrospective study, carried out over a period of 1 year in a university hospital having a level 3 perinatal activity, including the 499 primary cesarean sections of 2013. Two groups were defined by parity: nulliparous patients (group 1) and multiparous patients who had never previously been delivered by cesarean section (group 2). We have assessed the indication of every primary cesarean section and health status of newborns in each group.

Results: Groups 1 and 2 respectively included 369 and 130 patients. The cesarean section rate in 2013 was 24.7% with a primary cesarean section rate of 17%. Seventy-four percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women and 26% on multiparous (P<0.001). Sixty-three percent of the primary caesarean deliveries were performed on nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery were non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing (47.1%), failure to progress (24.8%) for which nulliparous women were more involved (29% vs. 13%, P<0.001) and fetal malpresentation (9.6%).

Conclusion: Further analysis of fetal heart rate during labor, a larger use of second line means to evaluate the fetal status during labor, using 6cm as the cut off for active labor, and encouraging vaginal operative delivery constitute the best way to decrease the primary cesarean section rate.

Keywords: Anomalies du rythme cardiaque fœtal; Défaut de progression; Failure to progress; Fetal malpresentation; Non-reassuring fetal heart rate; Première césarienne; Primary cesarean delivery; Présentation dystocique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by