Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep-Oct;56(5):513-520.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.05.002.

The impact of medication reviews by community pharmacists

Free article

The impact of medication reviews by community pharmacists

Ashra Kolhatkar et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Sep-Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Many Canadians use prescription medicines that are unnecessary or that can lead to adverse events. In response, many provinces have introduced programs in which pharmacists are paid to perform medication reviews with patients. As the evidence on such programs is equivocal, we investigated the impact of British Columbia's program.

Design: Interrupted time series.

Setting: British Columbia, Canada.

Participants: All residents of British Columbia who received a medication review between May 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013 (163,776 individuals).

Intervention: Using British Columbia's population-based PharmaNet drug utilization system, we collected data on community pharmacist-led medication reviews. The PharmaNet database contains a record of all medication reviews conducted in an ambulatory setting.

Main outcome measures: We studied the impact of first medication reviews conducted between May 2012 and June 2013. We used interrupted time series analysis to assess longitudinal changes in patients receiving a standard review (n = 147,770) and a more intensive pharmacist consultation (n = 16,006). Our outcomes included drug utilization, costs, potentially inappropriate prescriptions, and medication persistence measured through the proportion of commonly used chronic medications that were eventually refilled.

Results: Overall, we observed few changes in the level or trend of any of the outcomes we studied. Both review types were followed by significant increases in both the number of prescriptions per month and expenditures. The continuation of long-term medications did not change for 3 of 4 classes, and increased very slightly for the final class. We found no evidence of deprescribing, either for classes that are potentially problematic for long-term use (benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors) or for potentially inappropriate prescriptions in seniors.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that medication reviews did not significantly modify prescription drug use by recipients. Future iterations of such programs might be modified to be better targeted and to encourage closer collaboration between pharmacists and prescribing health care professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Kolhatkar A, Cheng L, Chan FKI, Harrison M, Law MR. Kolhatkar A, et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):298-299. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Mar 6. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017. PMID: 28279598 No abstract available.
  • Pharmacist medication reviews: Some hopeful comments about a negative finding.
    Brandt J, Leong C. Brandt J, et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):298. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 8. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017. PMID: 28285063 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources