Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;71(3):340-348.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.055. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

Identification of Site-specific Recurrence Following Primary Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Using C-11 Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Nomogram for Predicting Extrapelvic Disease

Affiliations

Identification of Site-specific Recurrence Following Primary Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Using C-11 Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Nomogram for Predicting Extrapelvic Disease

William P Parker et al. Eur Urol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Management of recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after radiotherapy (RT) is dependent on accurate localization of the site of recurrent disease.

Objective: To describe the anatomic patterns and clinical features associated with CaP recurrence following RT identified on advanced imaging.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective review of 184 patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RT for CaP.

Intervention: C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CholPET).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Recurrence patterns were classified as pelvic soft tissue only (as a surrogate for potentially salvageable disease) versus any extrapelvic disease, and clinical features were compared between patterns. Multivariable logistic regression was used to generate a predictive nomogram for extrapelvic recurrence. Discrimination was assessed with a c-index.

Results and limitations: Recurrence site was identified in 161 (87%) patients, with 95 (59%) sites histologically confirmed. Factors associated with the detection of recurrence included the difference between PSA nadir and PSA at CholPET (odds ratio: 1.30, p<0.01) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk classification (odds ratio: 10.83, p=0.03). One hundred (54.3%) patients recurred in the pelvic soft tissue only, while 61 (33%) had extrapelvic recurrence. Of 21 patients who underwent CholPET prior to meeting the Phoenix criteria of biochemical failure, 15 (71%) had recurrence identified on CholPET with 11 localized to the pelvis. On multivariable analysis, the difference between PSA nadir and PSA at CholPET, time from RT, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group were predictive of recurrence outside of the pelvis, and a nomogram was generated with a c-index of 0.79.

Conclusions: CholPET identified the site of recurrence in 87% of patients with a rising PSA after RT; most commonly within the pelvis in potentially salvageable locations. A predictive nomogram was generated, and pending external validation, this may aid in assessing the risk of disease beyond the pelvis. These findings underscore the importance of advanced imaging when considering management strategies for patients with a rising PSA following primary RT.

Patient summary: We identified anatomic patterns of recurrence in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen after radiotherapy using C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Most recurrences were localized to the pelvis and we were able to generate a tool to aid in disease localization prior to evaluation with advanced imaging.

Keywords: Nomogram; PET/CT; Prostate Cancer; Radiation Therapy; Recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nomogram analysis (A) calculating the probability of identifying extrapelvic and/or osseous disease on C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography at time of evaluation with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary radiotherapy (RT). Points are assigned by drawing a vertical line from each variable (ΔPSA, time from RT, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] risk group) to the “Points” line and adding the cumulative points. A line is then drawn down from the “Total Points” line at the corresponding point value. Where this line intersects with the “Probability of Extrapelvic Recurrence” line corresponds to the estimated probability of extrapelvic disease. (B) Decision-curve analysis comparing the net-benefit of using the nomogram (black dashed line) depicted above to the strategy of using PSA as a continuous predictor (red dashed line), a PSA cut-off of 3 ng/ml (green dashed line), or a PSA cut-off of 10 ng/ml (blue dashed line)
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nomogram analysis (A) calculating the probability of identifying extrapelvic and/or osseous disease on C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography at time of evaluation with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary radiotherapy (RT). Points are assigned by drawing a vertical line from each variable (ΔPSA, time from RT, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] risk group) to the “Points” line and adding the cumulative points. A line is then drawn down from the “Total Points” line at the corresponding point value. Where this line intersects with the “Probability of Extrapelvic Recurrence” line corresponds to the estimated probability of extrapelvic disease. (B) Decision-curve analysis comparing the net-benefit of using the nomogram (black dashed line) depicted above to the strategy of using PSA as a continuous predictor (red dashed line), a PSA cut-off of 3 ng/ml (green dashed line), or a PSA cut-off of 10 ng/ml (blue dashed line)

Comment in

References

    1. Roach M, 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H, Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: Recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:965–974. - PubMed
    1. Denham JW, Steigler A, Wilcox C, et al. Why are pretreatment prostate-specific antigen levels and biochemical recurrence poor predictors of prostate cancer survival? Cancer. 2009;115:4477–4487. - PubMed
    1. Morris LM, Izard MA, Wan WY. Does prostate-specific antigen nadir predict longer-term outcomes of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in conjunction with brachytherapy? Brachytherapy. 2015;14:322–328. - PubMed
    1. Uchio E, Aslan M, Ko J, Wells CK, Radhakrishnan K, Concato J. Velocity and doubling time of prostate-specific antigen: Mathematics can matter. J Investig Med. 2016;64:400–404. - PubMed
    1. Chade DC, Eastham J, Graefen M, et al. Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;61:961–971. - PubMed

Publication types