Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:2134959.
doi: 10.1155/2016/2134959. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Treatment of Refractory Postdural Puncture Headache after Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implantation with Epidural Blood Patch Procedures: A 20-Year Experience

Affiliations

Treatment of Refractory Postdural Puncture Headache after Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implantation with Epidural Blood Patch Procedures: A 20-Year Experience

Markus A Bendel et al. Pain Res Treat. 2016.

Abstract

A recent publication reported the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in conjunction with intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) implantation to be nearly 23 percent. Many patients responded to conservative measures but a percentage needed invasive treatment with an epidural blood patch (EBP). There is limited data to describe the technical details, success rates, and complications associated with EBP in this population. This study aims to provide a retrospective report of EBP for patients suffering from PDPH related to IDDS implantation. A chart review established a cohort of patients that required EBP in relation to a PDPH after IDDS implantation. This cohort was evaluated for demographic data as well as details of the EBP including technical procedural data, success rates, and complications. All patients received a trial of conservative therapy. Standard sterile technique and skin preparation were utilized with no infectious complications. The EBP was placed below the level of the IDDS catheter in 94% of procedures. Fluoroscopy was utilized in each case. The mean EBP volume was 18.6 cc and median time of EBP was day 7 after implant. There were no complications associated with EBP. EBP appears to be an effective intervention in this subset of PDPH patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wallace M., Yaksh T. L. Long-term spinal analgesic delivery: a review of the preclinical and clinical literature. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2000;25(2):117–157. - PubMed
    1. Hayek S. M., Deer T. R., Pope J. E., Panchal S. J., Patel V. Intrathecal therapy for cancer and non-cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2011;14(3):219–248. - PubMed
    1. Dahm P., Nitescu P., Appelgren L., Curelaru I. Efficacy and technical complications of long-term continuous intraspinal infusions of opioid and/or bupivacaine in refractory nonmalignant pain: a comparison between the epidural and the intrathecal approach with externalized or implanted catheters and infusion pumps. Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998;14(1):4–16. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199803000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raffaeli W., Righetti D., Caminiti A., et al. Implantable intrathecal pumps for the treatment of noncancer chronic pain in elderly population: drug dose and clinical efficacy. Neuromodulation. 2008;11(1):33–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00140.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin C.-P., Lin W.-Y., Lin F.-S., Lee Y.-S., Jeng C.-S., Sun W.-Z. Efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery system for refractory cancer pain patients: a single tertiary medical center experience. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2012;111(5):253–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.03.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources