Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:5146285.
doi: 10.1155/2016/5146285. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Bone Regeneration after Treatment with Covering Materials Composed of Flax Fibers and Biodegradable Plastics: A Histological Study in Rats

Affiliations

Bone Regeneration after Treatment with Covering Materials Composed of Flax Fibers and Biodegradable Plastics: A Histological Study in Rats

Tomasz Gredes et al. Biomed Res Int. 2016.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the osteogenic potential of new flax covering materials. Bone defects were created on the skull of forty rats. Materials of pure PLA and PCL and their composites with flax fibers, genetically modified producing PHB (PLA-transgen, PCL-transgen) and unmodified (PLA-wt, PCL-wt), were inserted. The skulls were harvested after four weeks and subjected to histological examination. The percentage of bone regeneration by using PLA was less pronounced than after usage of pure PCL in comparison with controls. After treatment with PCL-transgen, a large amount of new formed bone could be found. In contrast, PCL-wt decreased significantly the bone regeneration, compared to the other tested groups. The bone covers made of pure PLA had substantially less influence on bone regeneration and the bone healing proceeded with a lot of connective tissue, whereas PLA-transgen and PLA-wt showed nearly comparable amount of new formed bone. Regarding the histological data, the hypothesis could be proposed that PCL and its composites have contributed to a higher quantity of the regenerated bone, compared to PLA. The histological studies showed comparable bone regeneration processes after treatment with tested covering materials, as well as in the untreated bone lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Cranial cross-section embedded in paraffin (control and PLA) or methylmethacrylate (PLA-transgen and PLA-wt) stained with Masson-Goldner four weeks after PLA-composite insertion; collagen and nonmineralized bone in blue or green, mineralized bone in orange or red, and cell nuclei in dark brown or black; (b) histomorphometric analysis of bone regeneration. Stated is mean ± standard error. Bars represent 200 μm. ct = connective tissue; mb = mineralized bone; nmb = nonmineralized bone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Cranial cross-section embedded in methylmethacrylate (PCL and PCL-wt) or paraffin stained with Masson-Goldner four weeks after PCL-composite insertion; collagen and nonmineralized bone in blue or green, mineralized bone in orange or red, and cell nuclei in dark brown or black; (b) histomorphometric analysis of bone regeneration. Stated is mean ± standard error. Bars represent 200 μm. P < 0.05 PCL-wt versus control; # P < 0.05 PCL-wt versus PCL; + P < 0.05 PCL-wt versus PCL-transgen. ct = connective tissue; mb = mineralized bone; nmb = nonmineralized bone.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rogers G. F., Greene A. K. Autogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implications. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(1):323–327. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318241dcba. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert A., Leemrijse T., Druez V., Delloye C., Cornu O. Are bone autografts still necessary in 2006? A three-year retrospective study of bone grafting. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2006;72(6):734–740. - PubMed
    1. Delloye C., de Nayer P., Allington N., Munting E., Coutelier L., Vincent A. Massive bone allografts in large skeletal defects after tumor surgery: a clinical and microradiographic evaluation. Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery. 1987;107(1):31–41. doi: 10.1007/bf00463522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wheeler D. L., Enneking W. F. Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005;435:36–42. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000165850.58583.50. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berrey B. H., Jr., Lord C. F., Gebhardt M. C., Mankin H. J. Fractures of allografts. Frequency, treatment, and end-results. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume. 1990;72(6):825–833. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources