Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):1423.
doi: 10.3390/ijms17091423.

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Affiliations

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Adilson de Oliveira et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of planktonic and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Two hundred Staphylococcus spp. strains were studied, including 50 S. aureus and 150 CoNS strains (50 S. epidermidis, 20 S. haemolyticus, 20 S. warneri, 20 S. hominis, 20 S. lugdunensis, and 20 S. saprophyticus). Biofilm formation was investigated by adherence to polystyrene plates. Positive strains were submitted to the broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for planktonic and biofilm cells and the minimal bactericidal concentration for biofilm cells (MBCB). Forty-nine Staphylococcus spp. strains (14 S. aureus, 13 S. epidermidis, 13 S. saprophyticus, 3 S. haemolyticus, 1 S. hominis, 3 S. warneri, and 2 S. lugdunensis) were biofilm producers. These isolates were evaluated regarding their resistance profile. Determination of planktonic cell MIC identified three (21.4%) S. aureus strains that were resistant to oxacillin and six (42.8%) that were resistant to erythromycin. Among the CoNS, 31 (88.6%) strains were resistant to oxacillin, 14 (40%) to erythromycin, 18 (51.4%) to gentamicin, and 8 (22.8%) to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. None of the planktonic isolates were resistant to vancomycin or linezolid. MICs were 2-, 4-, 8-, and up to 16-fold higher for biofilm cells than for planktonic cells. This observation was more common for vancomycin and erythromycin. The MBCB ranged from 8 to >256 µg/mL for oxacillin, 128 to >128 µg/mL for vancomycin, 256 to >256 µg/mL for erythromycin and gentamicin, >64 µg/mL for linezolid, and 32/608 to >32/608 µg/mL for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The results showed considerably higher MICs for S. aureus and CoNS biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Analysis of MBCM confirmed that even high concentrations of vancomycin were unable to eliminate the biofilms of S. aureus and CoNS species. Linezolid was the most effective drug in inhibiting staphylococci in the biofilm, without an increase in the MIC, when compared to planktonic cells. None of the isolates were resistant to this drug.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; antimicrobials; biofilm; coagulase-negative staphylococci; resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Polystyrene plate adherence test. A, B, C, and D represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 1, 2, 7, and 9 (weakly adherent); 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 (non-adherent), and 12 (strongly adherent). Rows E, F, G, and H represent four replicates of the same strain: columns 13 (S. epidermidis ATCC 35983—positive control), 14 (S. epidermidis ATCC 12228—negative control), and 15–22 (sterile Trypticase Soy Broth—TSB).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Plate containing TSB with 2% glucose used for biofilm formation, cell recovery, and determination of MIC and MBCB; (B) Lid with pins for formation of staphylococcal biofilms.

References

    1. Hall-Stoodley L., Costerton J.W., Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Ver. Microbiol. 2004;2:95–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cafiso V., Bertuccio T., Santagati M., Campanile F., Amicosante G., Perilli M.G., Selan L., Artini M., Nicoletti G., Stefani S. Presence of the ICa operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004;10:1081–1088. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2002;43:1367–1378. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02827.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Otto M. Staphylococcal infections: Mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu. Rev. Med. 2013;64:175–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atshan S.S., Shamsudin M.N., Lung L.T., Sekawi Z., Ghaznavi-Rad E., Pei C.P. Comparative characterisation of genotypically different clones of MRSA in the production of biofilms. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:417247. doi: 10.1155/2012/417247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources