Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0162217.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162217. eCollection 2016.

Urinary Polyamines: A Pilot Study on Their Roles as Prostate Cancer Detection Biomarkers

Affiliations

Urinary Polyamines: A Pilot Study on Their Roles as Prostate Cancer Detection Biomarkers

Tik-Hung Tsoi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Current screening methods towards prostate cancer (PCa) are not without limitations. Research work has been on-going to assess if there are other better tests suitable for primary or secondary screening of PCa to supplement the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) test, which fails to work accurately in a grey zone of 4-10ng/ml. In this pilot study, the potential roles of urinary polyamines as prostate cancer biomarkers were evaluated. PCa, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients and healthy controls (HC) showing PSA>4.0ng/ml were enrolled in the study. Their urine samples were obtained, and the urinary levels of putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd) and spermine (Spm) were determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (UPLC-MS/MS). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and Student's t-test were used to evaluate their diagnostic accuracies. Among the three biogenic polyamines, Spm had demonstrated a good diagnostic performance when comparing their levels in PCa patients with BPH patients (1.47 in PCa vs 5.87 in BPH; p<0.0001). Results are in accordance with transrectal ultrasound prostatic biopsy (TRUSPB) results, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.83±0.03. Therefore urinary Spm shows potential to serve as a novel PCa diagnostic biomarker, which in turn can help to address the limited sensitivity and specificity problem of serum PSA test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Overlaid UPLC-MS/MS SRM chromatograms of 1000 ppb mixed polyamines standard (0–10 mins being shown).
Put (Black peak, tR = 4.3 min), Put-d8 (Pink peak, tR = 4.3 min), Spd (Blue peak, tR = 6.6 min), Spd-d8 (Red peak, tR = 6.6 min), Spm (Yellow peak, tR = 7.9 min) and Spm-d8 (Green peak, tR = 7.9 min).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Distribution of (A) normalized Put, (B) normalized Spd, (C) normalized Spm values in PCa, BPH and HC.
The black bar in the figures indicates the mean value of each subset while the error bar indicates the corresponding SEM.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for normalized Put, Spd and Spm values.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Polyamine metabolic pathway (focusing on Put, Spd and Spm only).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29. 10.3322/caac.21254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhavsar T, McCue P, Birbe R. Molecular diagnosis of prostate cancer: are we up to age? Seminars in oncology. 2013;40(3):259–75. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.04.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schroder FH, Kruger AB, Rietbergen J, Kranse R. Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer. JNCI. 1998;90(23):1817–23. - PubMed
    1. Rigau M, Olivan M, Garcia M, Sequeiros T, Montes M, Colás E, et al. The present and future of prostate cancer urine biomarkers. INT J MOL SCI. 2013;14(6):12620–49. 10.3390/ijms140612620 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson MC, Whang IS, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, et al. Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol. 1992;147:815–6. - PubMed

MeSH terms