Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;57(3):276-96.
doi: 10.1177/0022146516661597.

Is Sex Good for Your Health? A National Study on Partnered Sexuality and Cardiovascular Risk among Older Men and Women

Affiliations

Is Sex Good for Your Health? A National Study on Partnered Sexuality and Cardiovascular Risk among Older Men and Women

Hui Liu et al. J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Working from a social relationship and life course perspective, we provide generalizable population-based evidence on partnered sexuality linked to cardiovascular risk in later life using national longitudinal data from the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) (N = 2,204). We consider characteristics of partnered sexuality of older men and women, particularly sexual activity and sexual quality, as they affect cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular risk is defined as hypertension, rapid heart rate, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and general cardiovascular events. We find that older men are more likely to report being sexually active, having sex more often, and more enjoyably than are older women. Results from cross-lagged models suggest that high frequency of sex is positively related to later risk of cardiovascular events for men but not women, whereas good sexual quality seems to protect women but not men from cardiovascular risk in later life. We find no evidence that poor cardiovascular health interferes with later sexuality for either gender.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk; gender; life course; older adults; sexual frequency; sexual quality; sexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural Path Diagram of Cross-lagged Model for Sexuality and Cardiovascular Risks. Note: Bolded paths are the focus of this study with results reported in tables.

References

    1. Agresti Alan, Finley Barbara. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. 4. Prentice Hall; 2009.
    1. Bancroft John, Vukadinovic Zoran. Sexual Addition, Sexual Compulsivity, Sexual Impulsivity, or What? Toward a Theoretical Model. Journal of Sex Research. 2004;41(3):225–34. - PubMed
    1. Brody Stuart. The Relative Health Benefits of Different Sexual Activities. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;7(4pt1):1336–61. - PubMed
    1. Burman B, Margolin G. Analysis of the Association between Marital Relationships and Health Problems: An Interactional Perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112(1):39–63. - PubMed
    1. Butt Dorcas Susan. The Sexual Response as Exercise. Sports Medicine. 1990;9(6):330–43. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances