Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;57(3):390-406.
doi: 10.1177/0022146516660344.

Socioeconomic and Racial-ethnic Disparities in Prosocial Health Attitudes: The Case of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination for Adolescent Males

Andrea N Polonijo  1 , Richard M Carpiano  2 , Paul L Reiter  3 , Noel T Brewer  4
Affiliations

Socioeconomic and Racial-ethnic Disparities in Prosocial Health Attitudes: The Case of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination for Adolescent Males

Andrea N Polonijo et al. J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Research on prosocial attitudes, social networks, social capital, and social stratification suggest that lower-socioeconomic status (SES), Hispanic, and nonwhite individuals will be more likely than their higher-SES and non-Hispanic white counterparts to engage in health behaviors that serve a social good. Analyzing data from the University of North Carolina Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Immunization in Sons Study, we test whether SES and race-ethnicity are associated with willingness to vaccinate via prosocial attitudes toward HPV vaccination among adolescent males (n = 401) and parents (n = 518). Analyses revealed that (a) parents with lower education and (b) black and Hispanic parents and adolescent males reported higher prosocial vaccination attitudes, but only some attitudes were associated with higher willingness to vaccinate. We discuss these findings in terms of how prosocial attitudes may motivate certain health behaviors and serve as countervailing mechanisms in the (re)production of health disparities and promising targets of future public health interventions.

Keywords: HPV vaccine; health disparities; prosocial attitudes; race-ethnicity; socioeconomic status; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A research grant to Noel Brewer and Paul Reiter from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. funded the study. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. played no role in the study design, planning, implementation, analysis, or reporting of the findings. Noel Brewer has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, served on paid advisory boards, and served as a paid speaker for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Paul Reiter has received a research grant from Cervical Cancer-Free America, via an unrestricted educational grant from GlaxoSmithKline.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Agawu Atu, Buttenheim Alison M., Taylor Lynne, Song Lihai, Fiks Alexander G., and Feemster Kristin A.. 2015. “Sociodemographic Differences in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation by Adolescent Males.” Journal of Adolescent Health 57(5):506–14. - PubMed
    1. Andreoni James. 2001. “The Economics of Philanthropy” Pp. 11369–76 in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Smleser NJ and Baltes PB. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
    1. Baker Laurence C., Bundorf M. Kate, Singer Sara, and Wagner Todd H.. 2003. “Validity of the Survey of Health and Internet and Knowledge Network’s Panel and Sampling” Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
    1. Blau Peter. 1974. “Parameters of Social Structure.” American Sociological Review 39(5):615–35.
    1. Bohner Gerd and Dickel Nina. 2011. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 62:391–417. - PubMed

Substances