Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 23:7:1247.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247. eCollection 2016.

Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists

Affiliations

Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists

Laura Badenes-Ribera et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Common misconceptions of p-values are based on certain beliefs and attributions about the significance of the results. Thus, they affect the professionals' decisions and jeopardize the quality of interventions and the accumulation of valid scientific knowledge. We conducted a survey on 164 academic psychologists (134 Italian, 30 Chilean) questioned on this topic. Our findings are consistent with previous research and suggest that some participants do not know how to correctly interpret p-values. The inverse probability fallacy presents the greatest comprehension problems, followed by the replication fallacy. These results highlight the importance of the statistical re-education of researchers. Recommendations for improving statistical cognition are proposed.

Keywords: education; high education; p-value misconceptions; statistical cognition; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages of participants in each group who endorse at least one of the false statements in comparison to the studies of Badenes-Ribera et al. (2015a), Haller and Krauss (2002), and Oakes (1986).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of correct interpretation and statistical decision adopted broken down by knowledge area and nationality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychological Association (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    1. Asendorpt J. B., Conner M., De Fruyt F., De Houwer J., Denissen J. J. A., Fiedler K., et al. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. Eur. J. Pers. 27, 108–119. 10.1002/per.1919 - DOI
    1. Badenes-Ribera L., Frías-Navarro D., Monterde-i-Bort H., Pascual-Soler M. (2015a). Interpretation of the p value. A national survey study in academic psychologists from Spain. Psicothema 27, 290–295. 10.7334/psicothema2014.283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badenes-Ribera L., Frias-Navarro D., Pascual-Soler M. (2015b). Errors d'interpretació dels valor p en estudiants universitaris de Psicologia [Misinterpretacion of p values in psychology university students]. Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia 16, 15–32.
    1. Balluerka N., Gorostiaga A., Alonso-Arbiol I., Haranburu M. (2007). La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: una perspectiva práctica. [Adapting measuring instruments across cultures: a practical perspective]. Psicothema 19, 124–133. - PubMed