Advances in understanding prognosis in myeloma
- PMID: 27604166
- DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14304
Advances in understanding prognosis in myeloma
Abstract
In the last two decades outcomes in multiple myeloma (myeloma) have greatly improved, due to the introduction of newer, more effective therapies. This improvement is not uniform. Response to treatment and survival remains heterogeneous, with some patients living for 1-2 years whilst others are alive and progression-free at 10 years. This variation in outcome is due to patient characteristics plus features intrinsic to the myeloma tumour. Alongside the introduction of novel therapies there has been a greater understanding of disease biology and mechanisms of resistance. This has led to an increase in the number of prognostic markers that can be used in myeloma. This is important not only for more accurate counselling of patients in terms of disease outcome, but also in paving the way for risk-adapted therapy. Both newer and traditional prognostic markers need to be used in the context of planned therapy. Indeed, the prognostic value of certain markers varies according to which therapy the patient receives. As such, these prognostic factors will require constant re-evaluation as agents with new mechanisms of action are added into the myeloma treatment algorithm. This article summarises current concepts of prognostic markers in myeloma.
Keywords: multiple myeloma; myeloma therapy; prognostic factors.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic factors for multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies.Expert Rev Hematol. 2018 Nov;11(11):863-879. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2018.1537776. Epub 2018 Oct 26. Expert Rev Hematol. 2018. PMID: 30334460 Review.
-
Current Review on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017 Apr;12(2):96-108. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0368-z. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017. PMID: 28317082 Review.
-
Multiple myeloma: is it time for biomarker-driven therapy?Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e493-503. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e493. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015. PMID: 25993214 Review.
-
The clonal evolution during long-term clinical course of multiple myeloma.Int J Hematol. 2021 Feb;113(2):279-284. doi: 10.1007/s12185-020-02979-7. Epub 2020 Aug 30. Int J Hematol. 2021. PMID: 32864713
-
High-risk multiple myeloma: a multifaceted entity, multiple therapeutic challenges.Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jun;58(6):1283-1296. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1233540. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017. PMID: 27734720 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential of circular RNA itchy E3 ubiquitin protein ligase as a biomarker and treatment target for multiple myeloma.Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jan;9(1):335-345. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.71. Transl Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 35117187 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of type 2 and steroid-Induced diabetes mellitus on prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma.World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 30;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03982-0. World J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40886007 Free PMC article.
-
Model-Based Meta-Analysis for Multiple Myeloma: A Quantitative Drug-Independent Framework for Efficient Decisions in Oncology Drug Development.Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Mar;11(2):218-225. doi: 10.1111/cts.12524. Epub 2017 Nov 23. Clin Transl Sci. 2018. PMID: 29168990 Free PMC article.
-
The WNT receptor ROR2 drives the interaction of multiple myeloma cells with the microenvironment through AKT activation.Leukemia. 2020 Jan;34(1):257-270. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0486-9. Epub 2019 May 31. Leukemia. 2020. PMID: 31148590 Free PMC article.
-
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma: When and in Whom Does It Work.Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017 Apr;12(2):126-135. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0374-1. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017. PMID: 28285435 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials