Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):476.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1679-9.

Relationship between' patient's rights charter' and patients' satisfaction in gynecological hospitals

Affiliations

Relationship between' patient's rights charter' and patients' satisfaction in gynecological hospitals

Fereshteh Farzianpour et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patient's satisfaction with hospital services is one of the most important indicators of efficiency and quality of services of different hospital wards.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive analytical study was conducted in 2015. The study population included patients in gynecological hospitals of TUMS, and by using questionnaires; data were collected from 304 patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 22.

Results: The rights of patients were mainly observed through "quality of care" (Mean ± SD: 9.65 ± 2.62), "knowing the charges and the right to complain"; (Mean ± SD: 6.00 ± 2.5) "presence of an active system to handle complaints of patients in the hospital and explanation of the error that occurred during service provision to patients by the wrongdoer" is the lowest (7.5 ± 2.62). It was found that patients' satisfaction is below the mean and its different aspects are higher than the mean level. However, the services of physicians and feeding recorded the highest and lowest satisfaction, respectively (19.4 ± 4.25, 20.77 ± 4.39). The mean score of satisfaction of patients admitted with nursing physical care was 24.5 ± 6.2.

Conclusion: Overall, patients' satisfaction with hospital services was close to the mean. Deficiencies and grievances should be resolved with a correct measure.

Keywords: Gynecological hospitals; Patient’s rights; Patient’s rights charter; Patient’s satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aydin E. Rights of patients in developing countries: The case of Turkey. J Med Ethics. 2003;30:555–7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005819. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hakan Ozdemir M, Ozgür Can I, Ergönen AT, Hilal A, Onder M, Meral D. Midwives and nurses awareness of patients’ rights. Midwifery. 2009;25:756–5. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fallberg LH. Patients’ rights in Europe: Where do we stand and where do we go? Eur J Health. 2000;7:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Gillon R. An introduction to philosophical medical ethics: The Arthur case. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:1117–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6475.1117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zere E, Mandlhate C, Mbeeli T, Shangula K, Mutriua K, Kapenambili W. Equity in health care in Namibia: Developing a needs-based resource allocation formula using principal components analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2007;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed