Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;56(3):925-947.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1305-y. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

Metabolic syndrome and dietary patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Affiliations

Metabolic syndrome and dietary patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Míriam Rodríguez-Monforte et al. Eur J Nutr. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Lifestyle is linked to the risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS); however, its relationship with dietary patterns remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the association of a posteriori dietary patterns with the metabolic syndrome.

Methods: The PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched for epidemiological studies of dietary patterns and MetS. The association between dietary patterns and MetS was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 28 cross-sectional studies and three cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. In a comparison of the highest to the lowest category of prudent/healthy dietary patterns, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for MetS was 0.83 (95 % CI 0.76, 0.90; P for heterogeneity =0.0; and I 2 = 72.1 %) in cross-sectional studies, and the pooled relative risk (RR) for MetS in cohort studies was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.68, 1.21; P for heterogeneity =0.005; I 2 = 81.1 %). The pooled OR for MetS in a comparison of the highest to the lowest category of Western dietary patterns was 1.28 (95 % CI 1.17, 1.40; P for heterogeneity =0.0; and I 2 = 72.0 %) in cross-sectional studies, and the RR was 0.96 (95 % CI 0.53, 1.73; P for heterogeneity =0.102; I 2 = 62.6 %) in cohort studies.

Conclusions: The results from cross-sectional studies showed that a prudent/healthy pattern is associated with a lower prevalence of MetS, whereas a Western/unhealthy is associated with an increased risk for MetS. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the association between dietary patterns and MetS.

Keywords: Dietary patterns; Meta-analysis; Metabolic syndrome; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Br J Nutr. 2015 Apr;113 Suppl 2:S121-30 - PubMed
    1. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2013 Mar 27;10(1):30 - PubMed
    1. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e190-201 - PubMed
    1. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013 Sep;14(3):255-63 - PubMed
    1. Br J Nutr. 2000 Mar;83(3):257-66 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources