Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;142(12):2489-2496.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2243-z. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

High expression of miR-16 and miR-451 predicating better prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Affiliations

High expression of miR-16 and miR-451 predicating better prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Chuanli Ren et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the expression pattern of miR-16 and miR-451 and evaluate their prognostic value in 180 GC patients undergoing surgery.

Methods: In our previous study, a panel of five circulating miRNAs (miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-451 and miR-486-5p) can be used as a potential biomarker for detecting of early-stage gastric carcinoma (GC). Tissue microarrays were constructed from 180 patients with GC after surgery. MiR-16 and miR-451 expression was detected by miRNA-locked nucleic acid in situ hybridization, and their relationship with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival was analyzed.

Results: MiR-16 expression was decreased in 30.6 % (55/180) of GC, increased in 54.4 % (98/180) and unchanged in 15.0 % (27/180), compared with paracancerous normal tissue (P < 0.001). MiR-451 expression was decreased in 17.8 % (32/180), increased in 62.8 % (113/180) and unchanged in 19.4 % (35/180) of GC, compared with paracancerous normal tissue (P < 0.001).Univariate analysis indicated that low miR-16 and miR-451 expression, tumor stage, tumor status, node status and tumor size were significant negative prognostic predictors for overall survival in patients with GC (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.80; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.26; P = 0.05], low expression of miR-16 (HR 2.26; 95 % CI 1.51-3.40; P < 0.001) and miR-451 (HR 2.01; 95 % CI 1.36-2.96; P < 0.001) predicted shorter OS, while tumor status (HR 1.59; 95 % CI 0.73-3.48 P = 0.242), lymph node metastasis (HR 1.41; 95 % CI 0.71-2.82; P = 0.326) and tumor size (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 0.92-2.55; P = 0.099) were not. Moreover, patients with both miR-16 and miR-451 high expression have better OS than those with two miRNAs unchanged or low expression in GC tissues. Patients with both miR-16 and miR-451 high have better OS than patients with single miR-451 high expression.

Conclusions: High expression of miR-16 and miR-451 was associated with longer OS in GC patients. Especially patients with miR-16 and miR-451 double high expression will predict better OS. MiR-16 and miR-451 may be used as novel makers to evaluate prognosis and provide a new treatment target in GC.

Keywords: Gastric cancer (GC); MiR-16; MiR-451; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MiR-25 levels were stained using in situ hybridization. a MiR-25 staining using in situ hybridization in GC. b MiR-25 staining in adjacent normal tissue; increased miR-25 expression in GC compared with neighboring normal tissue. c MiR-25 staining using in situ hybridization in GC. d MiR-25 staining in adjacent normal tissue; increased miR-25 expression in GC compared with adjacent normal tissue
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Survival curves in patients with GC according to miR-25 levels. a Overall survival curves in 180 patients with GC according to miR-25 levels (P < 0.001). b Survival curves of patients with stage II GC according to miR-25 levels (P = 0.015). c Survival curves of patients with stage III GC according to miR-25 levels (P < 0.001)

References

    1. Bandres E, Bitarte N, Arias F, Agorreta J, Fortes P, Agirre X et al (2009) microRNA-451 regulates macrophage migration inhibitory factor production and proliferation of gastrointestinal cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 15(7):2281–2290 - PubMed
    1. Cui L, Zhang X, Ye G, Zheng T, Song H, Deng H et al (2013) Gastric juice MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the screening of gastric cancer. Cancer 119(9):1618–1626 - PubMed
    1. He C, Jiang H, Geng S, Sheng H, Shen X, Zhang X et al (2014) Expression and prognostic value of c-Myc and Fas (CD95/APO1) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(2):742–750 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kang W, Tong JH, Lung RW, Dong Y, Zhao J, Liang Q et al (2015) Targeting of YAP1 by microRNA-15a and microRNA-16-1 exerts tumor suppressor function in gastric adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer 14:52 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kogo R, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Komune S, Mori M (2011) Clinical significance of miR-146a in gastric cancer cases. Clin Cancer Res 17(13):4277–4284 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources