Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 6:9:30870.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.30870. eCollection 2016.

Incorporating gender, equity, and human rights into the action planning process: moving from rhetoric to action

Sanjeev Sridharan  1 , Joanna Maplazi  2 , Apurva Shirodkar  2 , Emma Richardson  2 , April Nakaima  2
Affiliations

Incorporating gender, equity, and human rights into the action planning process: moving from rhetoric to action

Sanjeev Sridharan et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Mainstreaming of gender, equity, and human rights (GER) is an important focus of the World Health Organization (WHO) and other UN organizations. This paper explores the role of action plans in mainstreaming GER. This paper is informed by a theory-driven evaluation lens.

Design: A theory of change framework explored the following seven dimensions of how action plans can implement mainstreaming of GER: awareness of the foundations of GER; understanding of context; planning to impact GER; implementation for GER; monitoring, evaluation, and learning; planning for sustainability; agenda setting and buy-in. The seven dimensions were used to analyze the action plans. Reviewers also explored innovations within each of the action plans for the seven dimensions.

Results: GER mainstreaming is more prominent in the foundation, background, and planning components of the plan but becomes less so along the theory of change including implementation; monitoring and evaluation; sustainability; and agenda setting and buy-in.

Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates that much more can be done to incorporate GER considerations into the action planning process. Nine specific recommendations are identified for WHO and other organizations. A theory-driven approach as described in the paper is potentially helpful for developing clarity by which action plans can help with mainstreaming GER considerations.

Keywords: action planning; gender, equity, and human rights; theory-driven evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Simplified theory of change by which Action Plans can Impact Mainstreaming of GER 3.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. World Health Assembly 2012: gender, equity and human rights at the core of the health response. Available from: http://www.who.int/hhr/news/wha_newslr_eng.pdf [cited 29 December 2015]
    1. WHO . Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2016. A foundation to address equity, gender and human rights in the 2030 agenda: progress in 2014–2015.
    1. Patton MQ. Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
    1. Sridharan S, Nakaima A. Ten steps to making evaluations matter. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34:135–46. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia. Mainstreaming gender, equity and human rights in the work of WHO. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/gender/topics/ger_mainstreaming/en/ [cited 29 December 2015]

LinkOut - more resources