Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 31;8(1):e1-9.
doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.955.

Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project

Affiliations

Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project

Michelle L Allen et al. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. .

Abstract

Background: Foot screening is an important part of diabetic care as it prevents significant morbidity, loss of function and mortality from diabetic foot complications. However, foot screening is often neglected.

Aim: This project was aimed at educating health care workers (HCWs) in a primary health care clinic to increase diabetic foot screening practices.

Setting: A primary health care clinic in the Western Cape province of South AfricaMethods: A quality improvement project was conducted. HCWs' needs were assessed using a questionnaire. This was followed by focus group discussions with the HCWs, which were recorded, transcribed and assessed using a general inductive approach. An intervention was designed based on common themes. Staff members were trained on foot screening and patient information pamphlets and screening tools were made available to all clinic staff. Thirty-two consecutive diabetic patient folders were audited to compare screening in 2013 with that in 2014 after initiation of the quality improvement cycle.

Results: HCWs' confidence in conducting foot screening using the diabetic foot assessment questionnaire improved markedly after training. Diabetic foot screening practices increased from 9% in 2013 to 69% in 2014 after the first quality improvement cycle. A strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results (SOAR) analysis showed promise for continuing quality improvement cycles.

Conclusion: The findings showed a significant improvement in the number of diabetic patients screened. Using strategic planning with appreciative intent based on SOAR, proved to be motivational and can be used in the planning of the next cycle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The quality improvement cycle.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Klapmuts clinic staff questionnaire.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Diabetic foot assessment questionnaire developed by the Western Cape Department of Health.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Foot screening completed in 2013 and 2014 (total of 32).
None

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation IDF diabetes atlas [homepage on the Internet]. 7th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2015. [cited 2016 March 13]. Available from http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas
    1. Lebrun E, Tomic-Canic M, Kirsner RS. The role of surgical debridement in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2010;18:433–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00619.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amputee coalition of America Factsheet: Diabetes and lower extremity amputations. 2008. [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2015 June 13]. Available from http://www.amputee-coalition.org/fact_sheets/diabetes_leamp.html
    1. Stevens CD, Schriger DL, Raffetto B, Davis AC, Zingmond D, Roby DH. Geographic clustering of diabetic lower-extremity amputations in low income regions of California. Health Aff. 2014;33(8):1383–1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0148Health - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tesfaye S, Gill G. Chronic diabetic complications in Africa. Africa Health [serial online]. 2011. [cited 2015 June 13]; 19:4–8. Available from http://www.africanjournalofdiabetesmedicine.com/articles/may_2011/Chroni...

LinkOut - more resources